...and we're back.
NOTE: the email address for this list has now changed! It is now
@lists.open-mpi.org (it used to be @open-mpi.org).
PLEASE UPDATE YOUR CONTACTS AND MAIL CLIENT FILTERS!
> On Jul 27, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
> We are beginning the list mi
We have transitioned the Open MPI mailing lists to our new best friends at the
New Mexico Consortium (http://newmexicoconsortium.org/). Thank you, NMC!
For at least a little while, you'll see newmexicoconsortium.org in the footers
of our mailing list mails. Eventually, we hope to replace those
On Jul 27, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>
> 1. New mails will start showing up there as they are sent across the lists.
> For example, the Open MPI "devel" list will show up under
Argh: that should have read:
For example, the Open MPI "devel" list will show up under
http
Hi Jeff,
>> 1. How about evaluating FUNNELED and SERIALIZED performance ?
>
> For Open MPI, it's basically THREAD_MULTIPLE and not-THREAD_MULTIPLE. I.e.,
> there's no real difference between SINGLE, SERIALIZED, FUNNELED
We were assuming that there would be cost due to
locking/synchronization in
