That would be sweet. Are you aiming for v4.0.0, perchance?
I.e., should we have "remove openib BTL / add uct BTL" to the target feature
list for v4.0.0?
(I did laugh at the Kylo name, but I really, really don't want to keep the
propagate the idea of meaningless names for BTLs -- especially sin
Does UCT support iWARP?
> On Apr 6, 2018, at 9:45 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
> That would be sweet. Are you aiming for v4.0.0, perchance?
>
> I.e., should we have "remove openib BTL / add uct BTL" to the target feature
> list for v4.0.0?
>
> (I did laugh at the Kylo name, but I
In case you didn't see it, I've posted a concrete proposal for shifting
configure's bias to using external libevent, hwloc, and pmix:
https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/5031
(We talked about this in kinda generalities in Dallas last month; this issue is
an attempt to actually nail down
Per our discussion at the Dallas meeting, I put together a first cut at a list
for v4.0.x features:
https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/wiki/4.0.xFeatureList
Please feel free to edit / discuss.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
___
devel mailing l
