component which can be customized, evolved, or otherwise
modified as necessary, with minimal effect upon the MPI functionality
(assuming a strong interface). Whether this should take the form of
a single framework I can't say, but that could be a reasonable way
to achieve a strong interface.
-
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, George Bosilca wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Tim Prins wrote:
> > I do not understand why a user should have to use a RTE which supports
> > every system ever imagined, and provides every possible fault-tolerant
> > feature, when all they want is a thin RTE.
>
> We ha
Hi Ralph -
How extensive are the changes involved in removing the GPR? How hard would
it be for someone to maintain an enhanced version of this as an addon or
compile-time optional module? Thanks.
- Doug
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Hello all
>
> Per last week's telec
hat some of the "bolt-ons" could
> be dynamically picked up by OMPI as binary modules or something.
>
> For now, though, there will be no GPR-like storage in the new system.
> Ralph
>
>
>
> On 2/12/08 1:43 PM, "Doug Tody" wrote:
>
> > Hi Ralp
