On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 17:21 -0800, Matt Leininger wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 16:45 -0800, Matt Leininger wrote:
> > Has anyone testing OMPI's alltoall at > 2000 MPI tasks? I'm seeing each
> > MPI task eat up > 1GB of memory (just for OMPI - not the app).
>
> I gathered some more data usin
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 09:28 -0800, Matt Leininger wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 10:00 -0700, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 17:21 -0800, Matt Leininger wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 16:45 -0800, Matt Leininger wrote:
> > > > Has anyone testing OMPI&
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 17:21 -0800, Matt Leininger wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 16:45 -0800, Matt Leininger wrote:
> > Has anyone testing OMPI's alltoall at > 2000 MPI tasks? I'm seeing each
> > MPI task eat up > 1GB of memory (just for OMPI - not the app).
>
> I gathered some more data usin
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 13:25 -0700, Greg Watson wrote:
> Bluesteel is a 64bit bproc machine. I configured with:
>
> ./configure --with-devel-headers --disable-shared --enable-static
>
> When I attempt to run an MPI program:
>
> [bluesteel.lanl.gov:28663] [0,0,0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not available in
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 14:42 -0700, Greg Watson wrote:
>
> The libraries required by the program are:
>
> $ ldd x
> librt.so.1 => /lib64/tls/librt.so.1 (0x2abc1000)
> libbproc.so.4 => /usr/lib64/libbproc.so.4 (0x2acdb000)
> libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 13:12 -0600, Ralph Castain wrote:
>
> 2. I'm not sure what you mean by mapping MPI processes to "physical"
> processes, but I assume you mean how do we assign MPI ranks to processes on
> specific nodes. You will find that done in the orte/mca/rmaps framework. We
> currently
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 12:33 -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
>
>
> On 4/3/07 9:32 AM, "Li-Ta Lo" wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 13:12 -0600, Ralph Castain wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> 2. I'm not sure what you mean by mapping MPI processes t
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 14:49 -0600, Brian Barrett wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> There was significant discussion this week at the collectives meeting
> about improving the selection logic for collective components. While
> we'd like the automated collectives selection logic laid out in the
> Collv2
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 15:10 -0400, Rolf vandeVaart wrote:
> We are running into a problem when running on one of our larger SMPs
> using the latest Open MPI v1.2 branch. We are trying to run a job
> with np=128 within a single node. We are seeing the following error:
>
> "SM failed to send messa
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 10:12 -0600, Brian Barrett wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 15:10 -0400, Rolf vandeVaart wrote:
> >> We are running into a problem when running on one of our larger SMPs
> >> using the latest
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 11:36 -0400, Terry D. Dontje wrote:
> To run the code I usually do "mpirun -np 6 a.out 10" on a 2 core
> system. It'll print out the following and then hang:
> Target duration (seconds): 10.00
> # of messages sent in that time: 589207
> Microseconds per mess
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 10:26 -0400, rolf.vandeva...@sun.com wrote:
> Li-Ta Lo wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 10:12 -0600, Brian Barrett wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Aug 28, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
&
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 14:06 -0400, Terry D. Dontje wrote:
> hmmm, interesting since my version doesn't abort at all.
>
Some problem with fortran compiler/language binding? My C translation
doesn't have any problem.
[ollie@exponential ~]$ mpirun -np 4 a.out 10
Target duration (seconds): 10.
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 12:25 -0400, terry.don...@sun.com wrote:
> Li-Ta Lo wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 14:06 -0400, Terry D. Dontje wrote:
> >
> >
> >>hmmm, interesting since my version doesn't abort at all.
> >>
> >>
> >&g
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 12:45 -0400, terry.don...@sun.com wrote:
> Li-Ta Lo wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 12:25 -0400, terry.don...@sun.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Li-Ta Lo wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
&
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 12:43 +0200, Torje Henriksen wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> I'm a student at the University of Tromso, and I'm trying to
> modify the shared memory component in the bit transfer layer
> (ompi/mca/btl/sm), and also the queues that this
> component uses.
>
> I was wondering i
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 13:38 +0100, Torje Henriksen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question that I shouldn't need to ask, but I'm
> kind of lost in the code.
>
> The btl sm component is using the circular buffers to write and read
> fragments (sending and receiving).
>
> In the write_to_head and rea
17 matches
Mail list logo
