Re: [openchange][devel] Message not delivered from Evolution to final destination

2010-05-11 Thread Brad Hards
On Wednesday 12 May 2010 10:27:36 am Vinay Nagrik wrote: > Q. Can I look into a log book for some file to check if the first MAPI > proxy received the message and similary check if the second MAPI proxy > received the message. When you start the samba4 server process, you can ask for debug data.

[openchange][devel] Message not delivered from Evolution to final destination

2010-05-11 Thread Vinay Nagrik
Hello Group, I have an email client free software Evolution from GNOME, and it is able to send the emails directly to any address, if I configure it to directly talk to the Exchange Server 7. However, if I reconfigured it to first to point to first MAPI proxy and then first MAPI proxy to second M

[openchange][devel] openchangeclient crashes when fetching tasks

2010-05-11 Thread Milan Crha
Hello, I faced this issue when working on tasks fetching in Evolution. The attached patch is a change for "openchangeclient --fetch-items=tasks" where are not fetched all properties (by GetPropsAll), but is given a list of named properties and prop tags which we know and it is requested to

Re: [openchange][devel] Revision 1762 slightly unusable

2010-05-11 Thread Julien Kerihuel
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:45 +1000, Brad Hards wrote: > > c) I'm afraid of memory usage. Are these arrays allocated on the global > > memory context freed with the mapi_sprop struct or on the program > > exit/global memory context free? The later is something I would like to > > avoid. But I do not

Re: [openchange][devel] Revision 1762 slightly unusable

2010-05-11 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:45 +1000, Brad Hards wrote: > > c) I'm afraid of memory usage. Are these arrays allocated on the > global > > memory context freed with the mapi_sprop struct or on the program > > exit/global memory context free? The later is something I would like > to > > avoid. But I do

Re: [openchange][devel] Revision 1762 slightly unusable

2010-05-11 Thread Brad Hards
On Monday 10 May 2010 05:55:48 pm Milan Crha wrote: > From the code reading I understood that struct mapi_SPropValue and > struct SPropValue are not 1:1, some values which can be stored in struct > SPropValue are not possible to store in struct mapi_SPropValue, and/or > vice versa. I found these th