On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 06:07:24PM +0200, Julien Kerihuel wrote: > On 31/03/14 11:22, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:05:35AM +0200, Julien Kerihuel wrote: > >> On 29/03/14 17:34, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > >>> Hi Julien, > >>> > >>> It's been a while since the last release, and a number of useful > >>> changes has landed since. I'd like to package these new changes for > >>> Debian. Can we do a 2.0.1 or a 2.1 release? > >> I also think it is time to ship a new release and would opt for 2.1. > >> > >> We still have in the pipe to merge several contributions from Zentyal > >> into master but I don't think it is reasonable to expect the task to be > >> completed within the next 2 weeks, so let's move forward and prepare an > >> agenda of forthcoming releases. > >> > >> Therefore +1 for me :-) > > Thanks :) > > > > I can actually put the release out, if you like. What exactly is involved in > > that? > Not much actually, releasing the new package is pretty trivial and i can > handle it, but prior to it, we should: > 1. apply pending tracker patches to master (if any) > 2. update online documentation to reflect any changes the new release > may introduce > 3. ensure packaging oc vs samba-4.1.4 is OK from packaging perspective > for you > 4. changelog
Can you add a 2.1 release in the tracker? I don't see one on http://tracker.openchange.org/projects/openchange/roadmap at the moment. I'll go through the existing bugs and see what we can/should target to 2.1. Cheers, Jelmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.openchange.org http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
