On 06/29/2012 05:48 PM, Patryk Benderz wrote:
I totally agree. Would be much better if there was some switch in
dfu-util to generate prefixes, instead of separate binary. So this
would involve migration of code from one program to another, right?
Correct. And dfu-suffix shares most of the code
[cut]
> I also feel that it would be handy to have dfu-suffix functionality
> integrated into dfu-util.
I totally agree. Would be much better if there was some switch in
dfu-util to generate prefixes, instead of separate binary. So this would
involve migration of code from one program to another,
On 06/29/2012 04:54 PM, Patryk Benderz wrote:
I wrote a patch to make dfu-utils to support TI Stellaris controllers
bootloader DFU mode.
This add's prefix to the binary that
[cut]
...so, it wasn't possible to add prefix as described here?
http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/devel/2012-February/00
Dnia 2012-06-29, pią o godzinie 15:12 +0300, Tommi Keisala pisze:
> Hello,
>
> I guess this is the upstream mailing list for the dfu-util as well?
A kind of :)
> I wrote a patch to make dfu-utils to support TI Stellaris controllers
> bootloader DFU mode.
> This add's prefix to the binary that
[c
Hello,
I guess this is the upstream mailing list for the dfu-util as well?
I wrote a patch to make dfu-utils to support TI Stellaris controllers
bootloader DFU mode.
This add's prefix to the binary that
First you add dfu-suffix to binary file with:
dfu-suffix -p 0x00ff -v 0x1cbe -d 0x -a
