On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:45 PM, sparky mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried building Firefox 3 for FSO from the MokoMakefile. I get a
> compilation error as follows:
>
> libcairo.so: undefined reference to `pixman_format_supported_destination'
>
> A google searc
I tried building Firefox 3 for FSO from the MokoMakefile. I get a
compilation error as follows:
libcairo.so: undefined reference to `pixman_format_supported_destination'
A google search led me to
http://www.mail-archive.com/devel@lists.openmoko.org/msg00817.html
How do I include moko-autorev.inc
I am following the steps in MokoMakefile wiki page, to build FSO.
When I do 'make setup', I get the following error:
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
fetch-pack from 'git://git.openembedded.net/git/openmoko.git' failed.
make: *** [setup-openembedded] Error 1
(I have set OM_GIT_SITE as
How do I build applications for FSO? Is it the same as mentioned in
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Toolchain ? What about the GTK+ libraries? Are
they available?
Specifically, I am wanted to compile Claws Mail, Ice Weasel and Pidgin for
FSO Milestone 2? Isn't it feasible to do so?
_
I was just thinking about the various UI-related layers that are there in
2007.2/2008.8/FSO. I understand that the idea is to re-use existing
technologies and concepts from the desktop world. However, wouldn't a
single-layer approach make things run a lot faster? Or have a more
customized / simpler
I have compiled Ruby 1.9 on the phone (since the compilation involves
building a miniruby first, and using that to build the rest). Using --prefix
for configure, I can obtain all the files in a seperate folder.
Now, how do I package these into an opkg file (.ipk/opk) ? I have a list of
files (with
>
> That image is not ASU, nor will it ever be.
>
> I havent even merged the latest changes in.
>
I had flashed :
openmoko-openmoko-qtopia-x11-image-glibc-ipk--20080806-om-gta02.rootfs.jffs2
In another thread I read it need to flash :
openmoko-qtopia-x11-image-om-gta02.jffs2
So is the latter on
>
> whatever you are seeing is not ASU - not what OM is developing it is some
> derivation that is different. i can tell you that simply by the fact you
> have
> a wallpaper and not a black bg with grey/white text. :) i have no idea what
> your source of "the good stuff" is... but your dealer is de
>
> Even I can confirm that I see a picture of a flower as wallpaper. I've
> flashed
> today with 20080807 rootfs from
>
> openmoko-openmoko-qtopia-x11-image-glibc-ipk--20080807-om-gta02.rootfs.jffs2
>
If at all we are putting a wallpaper, it should be an Openmoko logo :-) .
just my $0.02
___
>
> well u are NOT using what is actually ASU - you are using someones
> forked/changed version.. definitely not is what is being worked on by OM.
> it
> should be very black.
>
Wierd. I flashed the image available @
http://buildhost.openmoko.org/daily/freerunner/200808/20080806/
Will try again w
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 6:07 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> they should be nice little images now (not the original app icons that come
> with qtopia etc.)
>
Should I try a newer image? I am using Aug-06-2008 nightly build.
> press power suspends immediately. h
I know its still 2 days away from release, but I figured I'd give some
feedback on the current state (06-August-2008 image).
1) Awesome job!! OM2008.8 is making really good progress and the new image
had me all in smiles :-) . Keep up the good work!!! (My impressions were a
lot less enthusiastic l
I managed to compile and execute the tutorial GTK+ application (at
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Building_a_hello_world_application#GDK_the_Wrong_.2F_Easy_Way)
using the attached Makefile.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:08 PM, sparky mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had a follow-up quer
I have installed the GTA02 toolchain as mentioned in the wiki (from
http://downloads.openmoko.org/toolchains/)
However, I find only some libraries in
/usr/local/openmoko/arm/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/lib . What about the GTK+
libraries (and its dependencies)? How do I start GTK+ (or Qt for that
ma
I was wondering how many apps were available based on the Jalimo JVM. The
JVM seems to be pretty fast, along with SWT (with GTK backend). I would have
thought this would prompt many applications popping up.
___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.openmoko.org
r the '%.o: %.c' directive so that it picks up the .c from src/
and drops the .o into build//obj/ , and link the objs into the final
executable at build// ?
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 8:41 AM, sparky mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Roland Schatz
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Roland Schatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Hello
> > I set up the toolchain as per the instructions on the wiki and was
> > able to build and package the sample project as per the tutorial.
> >
> > My problem is that I am not very comfortable with the 'autoconf' wa
Anyone?
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:20 AM, sparky mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I set up the toolchain as per the instructions on the wiki and was able to
> build and package the sample project as per the tutorial.
>
> My problem is that I am not very comfortable with the
I set up the toolchain as per the instructions on the wiki and was able to
build and package the sample project as per the tutorial.
My problem is that I am not very comfortable with the 'autoconf' way of
doing things. I usually prefer a simple Makefile / Scons file.
I am assuming I can make do w
Don't mean to sound nagging but could you tell me an approximate ETA for the
meta toolchain?
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Julian Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:53:55PM +0530, sparky mat wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone's wor
I understand there's a "bug" in neod which causes cpu usage to shoot up
(well, not exactly a bug.. the accelerometers spew out too much data? 200
times per second? ) .. possibly, we could start there?
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Tilman Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Tilman Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sparky mat wrote:
> > kinda new here. i noticed that om2007.2 and asu are slower than qtopia
> > (the one from trolltech, not the x11 port). i presume its partly
> > because X is being used.
I would love to do that. Let me know. I haven't started development yet, so
really looking forward to this :-)
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Julian Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:53:55PM +0530, sparky mat wrote:
> > I was wondering if any
Came across this -
http://andreasdalsgaard.blogspot.com/2008/07/openmoko-development-in-5-minutes.html(this
is also linked from the 'Toolchain' page in wiki.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:53 PM, sparky mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone's work
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Marcus Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 13:26 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > Am Sonntag 27 Juli 2008 09:52:57 schrieb sparky mat:
> > > kinda new here. i noticed that om2007.2 and asu are slow
kinda new here. i noticed that om2007.2 and asu are slower than qtopia
(the one from trolltech, not the x11 port). i presume its partly
because X is being used.
would it make sense to alter gtk+ for om2007.2 to directly write to
screen? and prolly add some window management i guess.. or make X a
l
I was wondering if anyone's working on the "painless SDK installation" from
the Wishlist on the wiki. If so, I am interested in helping out with it.
___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
27 matches
Mail list logo
