Re: problems with calypso firmware update

2008-11-24 Thread thomasg
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Werner Almesberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Joerg Reisenweber wrote: > > seems FLUID isn't *that* bad, so are our instructions on wiki > > They're a bit like detailed instructions you give to Indiana > Jones for making it into the cave full of ancient traps, and

Re: Removing devel@ or staying on-topic

2008-10-27 Thread thomasg
I definitley think the devel list should stay. Yeah, especially in the last days/weeks the usage has decreased heavily, but it guess that's really a problem of distinction on the community lists side. It would be sad if devel was removed, because I just do not have the time to manually sort out al

Re: ARMv4 vs ARMv5

2008-10-15 Thread thomasg
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Graeme Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 11:52 +0100, Andy Green wrote: > > Hi - > > > > At some point we will be working with s3c6410, which is ARMv5 capable as > > well as existing ARMv4 capable. > > > > How is the distro side planning to

Re: Weekly Engineering News 39 & 40/2008

2008-10-11 Thread thomasg
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:19 AM, "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Holger Freyther ha scritto: > > On Thursday 09 October 2008 18:04:12 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote: > >> Marek Lindner wrote: > >>> - Openmoko is going to fund freesmartphone.org and treat it as a > >>> comple

Re: Free runner screen resolutions

2008-09-27 Thread thomasg
xrandr -s WIDTHxHEIGHT e.g. xrandr -s 320x240 On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Vladimir Jorgic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am curious if it would be possible to switch display resolution and anti > aliasing settings on Freerunner. Can this be done without recompiling the > driver?

Re: Alpha 2 Release of Accelerometer-based Gestures, and Screen Orientation

2008-08-14 Thread thomasg
Really great work! But I don't think a service depending on a running xserver should be an init script (even if the script can require the X init script to be ready). Imho it would be better to use the X infrastructure for that, maybe by an Xsession file. On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Paul-Vale

Re: New GSM-Modem (MC75i) - was "Weekly Engineering News 32/2008"

2008-08-12 Thread thomasg
Btw. - this telit chipsets look really nice. E.g. HSDPA 7.2 Mbit in about the same dimensions (only thicker) then the mc75i, datasheets available: http://www.telit.com/en/products/umts-hsdpa.php?p_id=14&p_ac=show&p=13 Maye to be considered for a future device? On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Pat

Re: New GSM-Modem (MC75i) - was "Weekly Engineering News 32/2008"

2008-08-12 Thread thomasg
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Patryk Szymczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > The dimensions it states is, that it's a 35x35x3.5mm package (a > announcement > > about the MC75i said, that it's using the same package) - compared to the > > current 2-chip solution from TI (10x10 + 7x7) this take

Re: New GSM-Modem (MC75i) - was "Weekly Engineering News 32/2008"

2008-08-12 Thread thomasg
Good to hear. I haven't measured it myself, I just took a look at the specs at the TI sites, linked in the wiki, that says "baseband module 10x10mm" and "rf module 7x7mm". On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Andy Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > >

New GSM-Modem (MC75i) - was "Weekly Engineering News 32/2008"

2008-08-12 Thread thomasg
As there are speculations about the new modem for a while, I recently checked out what we might get. There's really not much information about the Siemens MC75i modem around, but there's at least a very basic datasheet: http://mc75.ru/lib/datasheet_mc75_eng.pdf The dimensions it states is, that it'

Re: nfs on ASU

2008-08-05 Thread thomasg
You might use sshfs, should be available, too and no need to mess around with nfs :) On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Guillaume Chereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > | Am 05.08.2008 um 11:15 schrieb Andy Green: > > |> What workflow are you trying to achieve with NFS? Unless you're > > |> changi

Re: GSoC Accelerometer-based Gestures Update 9

2008-07-28 Thread thomasg
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Yorick Moko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sorry, I misread your mail, it seems you never experience the problem > Still it might be best if you add that fact to the bug 1244 > > /me whishes he had your freerunner :) Hehe, but that is not fully correct. I _have

Re: GSoC Accelerometer-based Gestures Update 9

2008-07-28 Thread thomasg
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:23 PM, thomasg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Yorick Moko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> could you specify which build you mean? i have the offset-bug also in >> the ASU image > > > Tried about 5-6

Re: GSoC Accelerometer-based Gestures Update 9

2008-07-28 Thread thomasg
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Yorick Moko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > could you specify which build you mean? i have the offset-bug also in > the ASU image Tried about 5-6 different builds, and it always worked. Also tried the FSO Milestone 1 build that works, too. qtopia-x11 build from 200

Re: GSoC Accelerometer-based Gestures Update 9

2008-07-28 Thread thomasg
You might try one of the ASU builds on the buildhost - I don't experience the landscape-offset-bug there, have it only in 2007.2. Anyway, nice work, can't wait to try it :) Btw. - I think listening for the screen rotate message should be handeled by one of the new FSO daemons (odeviced) directly to

Re: qpe on gta01

2008-07-16 Thread thomasg
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Esben Damgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm just wondering what qpe is doing on the qtopia and ASU images? It's > constantly using all of the cpu, rendering the whole distribution > unusable. > > Are people aware of this? And is it doing? It's as if it's busy-w