On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:28:16AM +, Dave Ball wrote:
> Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> > http://repo.or.cz/w/qi-bootmenu.git/blob/HEAD:/gui.c
> >
> >Dave, you should be able to add your gui by patching this file.
> Hi Marc,
>
> This attached patch:
> - uses the default evas engine (rather than gu
Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
http://repo.or.cz/w/qi-bootmenu.git/blob/HEAD:/gui.c
Dave, you should be able to add your gui by patching this file.
Hi Marc,
This attached patch:
- uses the default evas engine (rather than guessing x11/fb)
- introduces a grid layout
- adds new command line option
Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> I also restructured qi-bootmenu and added my own little GUI which
> looks something like:
>
> +--+
> | LOGO | /dev/mmcblk0p1
> | |
> +--+
> +--+
> | LOGO | /dev/mmcblk0p1
> | |
> +--+
> +--+
> | LOGO |
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 03:51:19PM +, Dave Ball wrote:
> Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> >
> >My current build scripts can be found at:
> >
> > git://repo.or.cz/qi-bootmenu-system.git
> >
> >It would be nice if someone could try it out by following the
> >instructions
> >in the README and reporting
Hi Marc,
Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 03:51:19PM +, Dave Ball wrote:
>> changes:
>> - use a git snapshot of kexec, including your uImage support
>> - add /mnt and /etc/dropbear to rootfs
>>
>
> /etc/dropbear should come from rootfs-overlay directory.
>
Fair enoug
Petr Vanek wrote:
> are you using X or talking directly into framebuffer?
framebuffer, through evas/ecore.
> if you follow the thread with my tests, i got 12seconds as well and
> this was with ssh access and also X server running, my select script
> was in (slow) python and TK. it was my big hope
for a more complex GUI will be the image size, and
>likely some impact on boot speed. Currently my image takes 12 seconds
>from power on to the gui, though that should go down when we're using
>a minimal kernel and initrd - rather than rootfs. I've no idea what
>the difference in boot speed will
Hi Dave,
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 03:51:19PM +, Dave Ball wrote:
> Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> >
> >My current build scripts can be found at:
> >
> > git://repo.or.cz/qi-bootmenu-system.git
> >
> >It would be nice if someone could try it out by following the
> >instructions
> >in the README and
Hello,
Wow! it's a very nice project! Thanks.
And what about a tiny-httpd like in routers, to setup things, and do simple
admin tasks? while we setup the network...
As i frequently lacks of an "ssh ready" machine, even if ssh can do a lot
more, i presume the first usage of it will be to specifyi
Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
My current build scripts can be found at:
git://repo.or.cz/qi-bootmenu-system.git
It would be nice if someone could try it out by following the
instructions
in the README and reporting back the results.
The attached patch makes a working rootfs for me, including
On 21 Nov 2009, at 10:32, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 01:26:18PM -, Tilman Baumann wrote:
>> Wow, I would love to test that.
>> Unfortunately I don't have a system for compiling it ready.
>>
>> Can you maybe provide pre-build images? I would like to test it on
>> gta01
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 01:10:29PM +0100, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:50:00PM +0200, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> > Proof of Concept
> >
>
> Some updates on what I've done so far:
>
> - ecore-con is no longer needed (It can be disabled during ./configure,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 01:26:18PM -, Tilman Baumann wrote:
> Wow, I would love to test that.
> Unfortunately I don't have a system for compiling it ready.
>
> Can you maybe provide pre-build images? I would like to test it on gta01
> with u-boot.
Hi,
Not yet I need to fix a few things first
I'm certainly interested as multibooting is the reason I stick with uboot. I
won't have a chance to look at it before next week though.
On Wednesday 18 November 2009, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:50:00PM +0200, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> > Proof of Concept
> > ==
Wow, I would love to test that.
Unfortunately I don't have a system for compiling it ready.
Can you maybe provide pre-build images? I would like to test it on gta01
with u-boot.
Thanks
Tilman Baumann
Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:50:00PM +0200, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:50:00PM +0200, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> Proof of Concept
>
Some updates on what I've done so far:
- ecore-con is no longer needed (It can be disabled during ./configure,
patch is in enlightenment svn)
- uclibc can be built with a minimal set of
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 02:51:12AM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:14:30 +0200 Marc Andre Tanner
> said:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:14:02AM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 13:00:12 +0200 Marc Andre Tanner
> > > said:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 09, 20
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 01:24:56PM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:50:42 +0400 Paul Fertser said:
> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) writes:
> > >> This would require that the kernel partition in NAND is formated as a
> > >> filesystem but then Qi couldn't read from it.
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:50:42 +0400 Paul Fertser said:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) writes:
> >> This would require that the kernel partition in NAND is formated as a
> >> filesystem but then Qi couldn't read from it. Or am missing something
> >> obvious here?
> >
> > the fs can be mounted
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) writes:
>> This would require that the kernel partition in NAND is formated as a
>> filesystem but then Qi couldn't read from it. Or am missing something obvious
>> here?
>
> the fs can be mounted as an offset from the start of a partition. you cn even
> split it
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:14:30 +0200 Marc Andre Tanner
said:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:14:02AM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 13:00:12 +0200 Marc Andre Tanner
> > said:
> > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:35:14PM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 22:50
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:14:02AM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 13:00:12 +0200 Marc Andre Tanner
> said:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:35:14PM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 22:50:00 +0200 Marc Andre Tanner
> > > > - GUI based on elementary with fr
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 13:00:12 +0200 Marc Andre Tanner
said:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:35:14PM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 22:50:00 +0200 Marc Andre Tanner
> > said:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have been lurking around on various openmoko mailing lists for quite
Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> ACK. It's better that way. This would mean changeing Qi to boot from NAND
> onces it sees any AUX press. Because otherwise we would have to skip over
> 2+ SD partition with AUX which doesn't seem to always work reliable.
I'd rather try to go away from NAND. More modern C
>I think this is no real improvement over the situation as it is now.
>Qi already supports boot selection via AUX which skips a partition
>although it is a bit cumbersome.
agree
>At the moment I prefer a 'full-featured' solution, if this proves to
>be unuseable speed wise we can still fallback to
>On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:43:39AM +0200, mobi phil wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> maybe time for fbui (http://home.comcast.net/~fbui/) ? I think Zack
>> Smith, the author would be happy to help you.
>
>To quote from the web page: "It currently only works with kernel 2.6.9,
>although I've got it partial
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:53:40AM +0200, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote:
> 2009/10/9 Sander van Grieken :
> > On Friday 09 October 2009 10:28:58 you wrote:
> >> 2009/10/9 Sander van Grieken :
> >> >> > if speed is a main factor why just keep the boot loader in text mode
> >> >> > selectionable
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:43:39AM +0200, mobi phil wrote:
> Hello,
>
> maybe time for fbui (http://home.comcast.net/~fbui/) ? I think Zack
> Smith, the author would be happy to help you.
To quote from the web page: "It currently only works with kernel 2.6.9,
although I've got it partially worki
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 06:32:20AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:35:14PM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > 3. do it all yourself at the lowest levesl. as small as it will get but by
> > far
> > the most amount of work for you.
>
> Would be nice to have also just text-ba
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:35:14PM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 22:50:00 +0200 Marc Andre Tanner
> said:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have been lurking around on various openmoko mailing lists for quite
> > some time (about 1.5 years) but so far I didn't have the time to actua
I love the idea. Especially because I must use uboot since I have no
fallback bootloader for DFU on my GTA01.
And uboot can only load kernels from NAND and not from SDHC card.
Booting into a minimal bootloader-kernel on NAND and then select different
OS on SD has a lot of appeal for me. Because cu
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 09:45:06PM -0300, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> > - In order for this to be useful it needs to be fast. Nobody wants
> >to wait 10+ seconds just to select which image to boot. Speed is
> >therefore the most important factor.
> [...]
> >T
David Reyes Samblas Martinez
http://www.tuxbrain.com
Open ultraportable & embedded solutions
Openmoko, Openpandora, Arduino
Hey, watch out!!! There's a linux in your pocket!!!
2009/10/9 Sander van Grieken :
> On Friday 09 October 2009 10:28:58 you wrote:
>> 2009/10/9 Sander van Grieken :
>> >>
Hello,
maybe time for fbui (http://home.comcast.net/~fbui/) ? I think Zack
Smith, the author would be happy to help you.
mobiphil
--
rgrds,
mobi phil
being mobile, but including technology
http://mobiphil.com
___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.op
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:35:14PM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> 3. do it all yourself at the lowest levesl. as small as it will get but by far
> the most amount of work for you.
Would be nice to have also just text-based ui or fb based just as
kexecboot have. Recent kexecboot has logo, icons,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 22:50:00 +0200 Marc Andre Tanner
said:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been lurking around on various openmoko mailing lists for quite
> some time (about 1.5 years) but so far I didn't have the time to actually
> contribute anything useful because of study and work related activities.
Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> - In order for this to be useful it needs to be fast. Nobody wants
>to wait 10+ seconds just to select which image to boot. Speed is
>therefore the most important factor.
[...]
>The user can of course still use the hardware buttons to skip the
>NAND boot
On Thursday 08 October 2009 22:50:00 Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> Goals
> =
>
> - The user should be able to select which image to boot from
>(surprised heh ;)
I like this idea. Right now the U-boot menu is fixed and not easy to change,
but with this
idea the available images can be dyna
Hi all,
I have been lurking around on various openmoko mailing lists for quite
some time (about 1.5 years) but so far I didn't have the time to actually
contribute anything useful because of study and work related activities.
However during the last few days I actually had some time to waste.
39 matches
Mail list logo
