Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-17 Thread BrendaWang
Sven 'sleipnir' Rebhan ??: > 2008/12/16 Marek Lindner : > >> Hi, >> > > Hello, > > >> as discussed some weeks back Openmoko wants to reduce the time spent on other >> things next to the phone. Part of that process is the shutdown of our >> projects.openmoko.org server. In the past we spe

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-17 Thread Sven 'sleipnir' Rebhan
2008/12/16 Marek Lindner : > > Hi, Hello, > as discussed some weeks back Openmoko wants to reduce the time spent on other > things next to the phone. Part of that process is the shutdown of our > projects.openmoko.org server. In the past we spent considerable time and > effort > maintaining it.

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-17 Thread Minh Ha Duong
Le mercredi 17 décembre 2008, Maximilian Bauer a écrit : > jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > > Currently the home page of http://projects.openmoko.org/ is full of > > cheery messages on how one can get involved. > > > > It would only be fair for somebody to please put a pointer to this > > discussion th

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-17 Thread Maximilian Bauer
jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > Currently the home page of http://projects.openmoko.org/ is full of > cheery messages on how one can get involved. > > It would only be fair for somebody to please put a pointer to this > discussion there. sorry, my delay, a text within the banner of projects is now i

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-17 Thread Armin ranjbar
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:43:27 +0800 Marek Lindner wrote: > Great! Glad that you want to step up. > How should we proceed ? Do you want to have the DNS entries and run it > on your server ? Should we give you access to our server ? Should every > interested person get root access ? When and how sho

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-17 Thread Marek Lindner
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 19:12:29 Lech Karol Pawłaszek wrote: > Armin, Marek: I also can offer my help (if any needed) in maintaining > the p.o.o. TBH I installed and maintaining only two GForge installations > but I'm a long time admin (with Debian being my favorite operating > system) who wo

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-17 Thread Lech Karol Pawłaszek
Armin ranjbar wrote: > Dear all , > > while i have send same request to Marek about this , i have to tell list > that I'm ready and willing to take care of Projects.openmoko.org , i have > a lot of experience with installing and maintaining Gforge portals . Hello. Kudos to the OM team. This is

status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-17 Thread Armin ranjbar
Dear all , while i have send same request to Marek about this , i have to tell list that I'm ready and willing to take care of Projects.openmoko.org , i have a lot of experience with installing and maintaining Gforge portals . -- Armin ranjbar , System Administrator __

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-17 Thread BrendaWang
Yaroslav Halchenko ??: > wow -- I did not know that maintaining GForge portal is a difficult and > duty -- is it too buggy? may be it is worth sending bug reports to > upstream or within respective distribution running on the box? > > I know quite a few success stories (e.g. http://alioth.debian.or

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-16 Thread jidanni
Currently the home page of http://projects.openmoko.org/ is full of cheery messages on how one can get involved. It would only be fair for somebody to please put a pointer to this discussion there. ___ devel mailing list devel@lists.openmoko.org https:/

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-16 Thread Sean Moss-Pultz
On 12/16/08 Rod Whitby wrote: > > It's unfair to say that we won't pay for somebody to maintain this. > > > Money is not the issue. We've said this numerous times. It's > opportunity > > > cost. We've never been able to get projects* running well. It's > super > > > painful for me each time I

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-16 Thread Rod Whitby
Sean Moss-Pultz wrote: > On 12/16/08 Rod Whitby wrote: >> The closure of projects.openmoko.org is (IMHO) a step in the wrong >> direction, since it further fragments the openmoko developer resources >> and community. >> >> This action says "Openmoko does not value the contributions of the >> commun

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-16 Thread Marek Lindner
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 17:11:01 Harald Welte wrote: > So maybe the community could decide if they would want to run and maintain > projects.openmoko.org? Would that be a working compromise? Since Openmoko > is always about the community, why not let them decide? I'm sure if there > are enou

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-16 Thread Sean Moss-Pultz
On 12/16/08 Rod Whitby wrote: > The closure of projects.openmoko.org is (IMHO) a step in the wrong > direction, since it further fragments the openmoko developer resources > and community. > > This action says "Openmoko does not value the contributions of the > community developers who use projec

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-16 Thread Harald Welte
Hi Marek, On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:03:24PM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote: > as discussed some weeks back Openmoko wants to reduce the time spent on other > things next to the phone. Part of that process is the shutdown of our > projects.openmoko.org server. In the past we spent considerable tim

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-16 Thread Peter Neubauer
mmh, I am involved in the community infrastructure at www.ops4j.org. We have 3 paid servers hosted in Germany and are currently upgrading our infrastructure (the mai wiki is not online right now, sorry). We are running the whole Atlassian Suite (Jira, Confluence, Bamboo, Crowd, Crucible) backed by

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-16 Thread Rod Whitby
Marek Lindner wrote: > as discussed some weeks back Openmoko wants to reduce the time spent on other > things next to the phone. Part of that process is the shutdown of our > projects.openmoko.org server. In the past we spent considerable time and > effort > maintaining it. As many people notic

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-16 Thread Marek Lindner
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 16:47:19 David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote: > At least, openmoko instead "go find yourself a new home", better > provide a devel manual,howto,faq or any kind of document where specify > recommended sites which provides the same or equivalent facilities and > tools they

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-16 Thread Marek Lindner
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 13:04:44 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > sounds again like a broken promise to me, sorry, and imho is not nice > -- is really a lot of effort put by OM to maintain that poor website??? > > May be it is worth finding a person in the community who would not mind > taking a bu

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-16 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
:( It's not good news, so what will happen with the mailing lists already in projects.openmoko.org? I got two of them pretty active (fdom-devel and openmoko-spain) I'm agree openmoko core developers focus their effort in the inners of the phone and let the community deal with the rest but I'm sorr

Re: status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-15 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
wow -- I did not know that maintaining GForge portal is a difficult and duty -- is it too buggy? may be it is worth sending bug reports to upstream or within respective distribution running on the box? I know quite a few success stories (e.g. http://alioth.debian.org/) of using gforge just to serv

status of projects.openmoko.org

2008-12-15 Thread Marek Lindner
Hi, as discussed some weeks back Openmoko wants to reduce the time spent on other things next to the phone. Part of that process is the shutdown of our projects.openmoko.org server. In the past we spent considerable time and effort maintaining it. As many people noticed things were not perfect