On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 06:05:03 +0200
Holger Freyther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 04:26:18 Mike Montour wrote:
>
> > Is it possible that u-boot was built from the org.openmoko.dev
> > branch (which doesn't yet have the updated recipes) rather than from
> > org.openmoko.asu.*
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 04:26:18 Mike Montour wrote:
> Is it possible that u-boot was built from the org.openmoko.dev branch
> (which doesn't yet have the updated recipes) rather than from
> org.openmoko.asu.*?
Right. The public buildhost does not build org.openmoko.asu.*. I hope that
XorA will
On 21-Jul-08, at 6:53 AM, Holger Freyther wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. Looks fine. I will try to the test it on monday and put it
>> into
>> asu.dev/stable.
>
> it is in.
Unfortunately the changes didn't make it onto buildhost - today's
http://buildhost.openmoko.org/daily/freerunner/200807/20080722/
On Sunday 20 July 2008 12:00:41 Holger Freyther wrote:
> On Sunday 20 July 2008 06:57:14 Mike Montour wrote:
> > I would appreciate it if someone from Openmoko could review this
> > recipe and make any necessary changes.
>
> Thanks. Looks fine. I will try to the test it on monday and put it into
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
|> Yes it is OK, we fixed U-Boot GTA02 at v5 and will use the revision
|> pins
|> you mentioned. So all shipping GTA02 should use the same "v5" U-
|> Boot setup.
|
| In that case, I wonder if it might be bet
On 20-Jul-08, at 12:59 AM, Andy Green wrote:
> | I have also added a UBOOT_MACHINES entry for "gta02v6", although
> I'm not
> | sure if this is required or if the "gta02v5" u-boot can be used
> instead
> | (with the software auto-detecting the actual board revision
> through GPIO
> | pins).
On Sunday 20 July 2008 06:57:14 Mike Montour wrote:
> I would appreciate it if someone from Openmoko could review this
> recipe and make any necessary changes.
Thanks. Looks fine. I will try to the test it on monday and put it into
asu.dev/stable.
The complains I have are issue not introduced b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| It appears that the u-boot images built with Openembedded and published
| on buildhost.openmoko.org/daily/... are still built from a bitbake
| recipe that uses the upstream (www.denx.de) git repository + a p
It appears that the u-boot images built with Openembedded and
published on buildhost.openmoko.org/daily/... are still built from a
bitbake recipe that uses the upstream (www.denx.de) git repository + a
patch series from Openmoko's svn repository (indicated by the
"+svnr4297" in the filename
