Feature Requests item #1950571, was opened at 2008-04-24 03:38
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743023&aid=1950571&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of th
Feature Requests item #1950571, was opened at 2008-04-24 12:38
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by axlh
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743023&aid=1950571&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Feature Requests item #1960032, was opened at 2008-05-08 08:40
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743023&aid=1960032&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain
Revision: 4129
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4129&view=rev
Author: dan_pascu
Date: 2008-05-07 23:34:04 -0700 (Wed, 07 May 2008)
Log Message:
---
Small fix in log message casing
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/dialog/dlg_req_within.c
Thi
Revision: 4128
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4128&view=rev
Author: dan_pascu
Date: 2008-05-07 23:30:01 -0700 (Wed, 07 May 2008)
Log Message:
---
Simplified code by using the newly added ref_dlg function
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/dia
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
> I found it more natural to be on (as if there is no TCP ping, openser
> will not do anything more). Also it will much easier for the users to
> use TCP as they do not have to get into "dirty" details to make it
> work.
bogdan,
my wording was not clear. i mean
Can we get a backport for this to 1.3 as well?
On Sunday 04 May 2008, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Revision: 4109
> http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4109&view=rev
> Author: miconda
> Date: 2008-05-03 14:17:51 -0700 (Sat, 03 May 2008)
>
> Log Message:
>
Revision: 4127
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4127&view=rev
Author: dan_pascu
Date: 2008-05-07 22:07:58 -0700 (Wed, 07 May 2008)
Log Message:
---
Fixed wrong character check in unescape_common
Modified Paths:
--
branches/1.3/strcommon.c
T
Bugs item #1959944, was opened at 2008-05-08 03:35
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by viraptor
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1959944&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comme
Bugs item #1959944, was opened at 2008-05-08 03:35
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1959944&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Hi Juha,
I found it more natural to be on (as if there is no TCP ping, openser
will not do anything more). Also it will much easier for the users to
use TCP as they do not have to get into "dirty" details to make it work .
Regards,
Bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
>
>
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
> - patch adds new core parameter "tcp_crlf_pingpong" which is by
> - default on
thanks bogdan for the commit. i like the change of the default.
-- juha
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser
Patches item #1951508, was opened at 2008-04-25 13:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bogdan_iancu
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743022&aid=1951508&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the c
Revision: 4126
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4126&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-05-07 13:08:00 -0700 (Wed, 07 May 2008)
Log Message:
---
- applied patch for adding outbound CRLF ping-pong for TCP.
- credits go to:
* code was added to SER
Hi Matheus,
I was referring to the "uri" variableIs it a typo in your reply? It
should be sip_uri* type :)
Check if the string you pass to "parse_uri" is not empty and try to see
if there are any fields set in the structure after parsing.
Regards,
Bogdan
Matheus Araújo Aguiar wrote:
> H
Patches item #1956216, was opened at 2008-05-02 18:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bogdan_iancu
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743022&aid=1956216&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the c
Thank you Juha for all this improvements.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Juha Heinanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Revision: 4125
> http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4125&view=rev
> Author: juhe
> Date: 2008-05-07 10:46:33 -0700 (Wed, 07 May
Revision: 4125
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4125&view=rev
Author: juhe
Date: 2008-05-07 10:46:33 -0700 (Wed, 07 May 2008)
Log Message:
---
* Added group_id parameter to allow_address function, which is now
possible when there can be more that two funct
Revision: 4124
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4124&view=rev
Author: henningw
Date: 2008-05-07 09:36:48 -0700 (Wed, 07 May 2008)
Log Message:
---
- convert existing documentation to doxygen format
- add some comments, some smaller cleanups
- small adjustment
Patches item #1956216, was opened at 2008-05-02 11:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by osas
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743022&aid=1956216&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment t
Bugs item #1958839, was opened at 2008-05-06 18:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bogdan_iancu
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1958839&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comm
Patches item #1956216, was opened at 2008-05-02 18:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bogdan_iancu
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743022&aid=1956216&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the c
Revision: 4123
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4123&view=rev
Author: henningw
Date: 2008-05-07 09:02:41 -0700 (Wed, 07 May 2008)
Log Message:
---
- add tests for fetch_result functionality used from usrloc for mysql and
postgres database
- modify existing
Patches item #1956216, was opened at 2008-05-02 11:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by osas
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743022&aid=1956216&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment t
Hi Dan,
I suggest the following plan of action - as you said, time is critical
for 1.4 release, so we should move fast:
1) you upload the new module (nat_traversal) as it is - without the
combined common part of nathelper/mediaproxy
2) we do a logical merge between the signalling (SIP+SDP) rel
Patches item #1951508, was opened at 2008-04-25 13:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bogdan_iancu
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743022&aid=1951508&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the c
Patches item #1951508, was opened at 2008-04-25 12:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ibc_sf
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743022&aid=1951508&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Patches item #1956216, was opened at 2008-05-02 18:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bogdan_iancu
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743022&aid=1956216&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the c
Hi Henning,
It sounds fine for me.
I still have some fixes I want to push into 1.3 - I'm currently holding
them back for more testing as we found these issues in some running
platforms. I would suggest doing the 1.3.2 somewhere next week -
Thursday 15 of May will be ok?
For 1.4 - the freeze d
Hi Julian,
Have you tried to use the the shmem statistics to monitor the usage of
SHM memory?
Both for PKG and SHM memory, openser allocs at startup the whole memory
(depending of how much you configured). Any leak will not be vizible for
any external tools.
Also, are you using any module tha
it is fixed on rev 4122
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I've updated my OpenSer trunk via "svn update" and got rev 4121.
> I do a "make deb" and it gives me an error:
>
>
> ---
> gcc -fPIC -DPIC -Wall -g -O2 -Wcast-alig
Hi, I've updated my OpenSer trunk via "svn update" and got rev 4121.
I do a "make deb" and it gives me an error:
---
gcc -fPIC -DPIC -Wall -g -O2 -Wcast-align -DMOD_NAME='"permissions"'
-DNAME='"openser"' -DVERSION='"1.4.0dev11-notls"' -DARCH='"i386"'
-DOS='"linux"'
Revision: 4122
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4122&view=rev
Author: juhe
Date: 2008-05-07 03:30:30 -0700 (Wed, 07 May 2008)
Log Message:
---
* Added fixup functions fixup_pvar_pvar/fixup_free_pvar_pvar.
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/mod_fix.c
El Wednesday 07 May 2008 11:40:13 Juha Heinanen escribió:
> Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
> > I didn't know about it. Please, could you point me to that patch or its
> > description? (or just revision number).
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1920843&group_id=1
>39143&ati
On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Henning Westerholt wrote:
> This is all fine for me. I also looked some time ago into both modules,
> and even if i don't consider me an expert for NAT setups i noticed some
> code duplication and such.
>
> As long as no functionality of the nathelper module is lost i also
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
> I didn't know about it. Please, could you point me to that patch or its
> description? (or just revision number).
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1920843&group_id=139143&atid=743023
-- juha
___
On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> El Tuesday 06 May 2008 18:02:01 Dan Pascu escribió:
> > 1. A new module called nat_traversal which implements a fully
> > featured NAT keepalive functionality for SIP signaling. This
> > keepalive functionality offers the following features:
>
>
On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Henning Westerholt wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> i proposed 8 weeks just to provide buffer for eventual delays, and also
> to have some time for the needed integration after the (eventual) rush
> of changes before the code freeze. Perhaps Bogdan or Daniel have some
> more extens
Revision: 4121
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4121&view=rev
Author: juhe
Date: 2008-05-07 02:34:34 -0700 (Wed, 07 May 2008)
Log Message:
---
* Added two optional pseudo variable arguments to allow_trusted function
that, if present, are used instead of req
El Wednesday 07 May 2008 11:08:04 Juha Heinanen escribió:
> Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
> > What about SIP TCP signalling? does the new module implement any way to
> > mantain the keepalive in a TCP connection using CRLF or anything?
>
> i don't think that is necessary, because tcp keepalives are
On Tuesday 06 May 2008, Dan Pascu wrote:
> I have a new module dealing with nat traversal that is in the work and
> testing for the last 6 months.
> [...]
>
> [features and capabilities]
Hi Dan,
sounds really good, and great that you want to contribute this code.
> How I see this progressing fr
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
> What about SIP TCP signalling? does the new module implement any way to
> mantain the keepalive in a TCP connection using CRLF or anything?
i don't think that is necessary, because tcp keepalives are handled by
the core once the patch that klaus submitted is commit
El Tuesday 06 May 2008 18:02:01 Dan Pascu escribió:
> 1. A new module called nat_traversal which implements a fully featured NAT
> keepalive functionality for SIP signaling. This keepalive functionality
> offers the following features:
Hi, it sounds great.
What about SIP TCP signalling? does the
On Tuesday 06 May 2008, Dan Pascu wrote:
> > we've agreed some time ago that the feature freeze for 1.3.0 will be
> > begin at "end of may". Just to have a more exact date i propose that we
> > freeze the svn trunk and start the testing period on the 3th June (four
> > weeks from now).
> >
> > This
44 matches
Mail list logo
