On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Tuesday 10 June 2008 14:40:33 Thiago Maluf escribió:
>> Hi List,
>>
>> When I have one call established with UA1 and UA2 and UA1 would like
>> to transfer this call to UA3.
>> Then this user put UA2 in hold and call
Bogdan,
these changes make little sense. Only end_media_session makes sense for
the local_route.
use_media_proxy makes little sense as the generated request is only BYE
at the moment (which should call end_media_session).
fix_contact and client_nat_test also do not make sense to be called in
t
Henning Westerholt wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 June 2008, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>
>> Is the SVN frozen or not? The announced date was for 6th of June and
>> there is an ongoing discussion about pre-longing this date or not, but
>> there was no decision yet announced.
>>
>> And I see non bug fixi
Documentation item #1990015, was opened at 2008-06-10 10:47
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=782960&aid=1990015&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a f
Bugs item #1989917, was opened at 2008-06-10 17:38
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ibc_sf
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1989917&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment th
Henning,
As so far the discussion was carried on the list, invoking the interest
of the project and of all related people, I will reserve my right to
carry on this discussion here.
Also, the discussion must be public as it might interest other people
too, as, in my opinion, it reveals some conc
Bugs item #1989917, was opened at 2008-06-10 11:38
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1989917&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Revision: 4372
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4372&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 08:11:50 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- enable case sensitive checking for FM ops
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/avpops/avpops_
Revision: 4371
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4371&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 08:09:08 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- the radius function for checking uri are safe in LOCAL ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/mod
Revision: 4370
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4370&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 08:07:46 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
-one function is safe to be used from LOCAL ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/uri_db/u
Revision: 4369
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4369&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 08:05:12 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- several URI functions are suitable for LOCAL ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/uri/u
Revision: 4368
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4368&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 08:03:25 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- group radius checking can be done from LOCAL_ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/group
Revision: 4367
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4367&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 08:02:24 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
statistics are safe to be used from LOCAL ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/statistic
Revision: 4366
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4366&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 08:01:34 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- siptrace can be done from LOCAL ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/siptrace/siptrace.
Revision: 4365
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4365&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 08:00:56 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
rate limits may be checked from LOCAL ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/ratelimit/rat
Revision: 4364
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4364&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 07:56:58 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
-permissions may be checked from LOCAL ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/permissions/p
Revision: 4363
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4363&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 07:55:11 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- peer detection can be done from LOCAL_ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/peering/peer
Revision: 4362
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4362&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 07:53:47 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- nat traversal functions may be called from LOCAL_ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/m
Revision: 4361
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4361&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 07:52:32 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- LDAP queries are safe to be called from LOCAL_ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/h350
Revision: 4360
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4360&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 07:50:43 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
-allow the group functions to be called from LOCAL_ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/g
Revision: 4359
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4359&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 07:49:42 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- enable several functions (only the one suitable) for LOCAL_ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk
Revision: 4358
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4358&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 07:48:16 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
allow the group functions to be called from LOCAL_ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/do
Revision: 4357
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4357&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 07:47:35 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
enable exported functions to be called from the LOCAL_ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modul
Revision: 4356
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4356&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2008-06-10 07:46:44 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
enable the exported functions to be called from LOCAL_ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modul
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
> This is fine with me - should we split new modules versus design and
> arch changes? or keep them together under the same umbrella ?
i would like to keep core design changes at1 month. a new module is not
so critical since it is not mandatory to use it.
-- juha
Revision: 4355
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4355&view=rev
Author: henningw
Date: 2008-06-10 07:10:21 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- spelling fix, accouting -> accounting
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/etc/openser.cfg
trunk/modu
On Tuesday 10 June 2008, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> [..]
Hi Bogdan,
> 1) major design issues and architectural reasons are invoked just to
> mislead people around and delay the freeze - and now the only changes
> are about enabling the local_route for more certain
> modules...hmmm...This looks
Hi Henning,
to be honest, I do not like what happens:
1) major design issues and architectural reasons are invoked just to
mislead people around and delay the freeze - and now the only changes
are about enabling the local_route for more certain
modules...hmmm...This looks like pushing argument
Revision: 4354
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4354&view=rev
Author: henningw
Date: 2008-06-10 06:12:20 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- some spelling fixes
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/dialog/README
trunk/modules/dialog/d
On Tuesday 10 June 2008, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Is the SVN frozen or not? The announced date was for 6th of June and
> there is an ongoing discussion about pre-longing this date or not, but
> there was no decision yet announced.
>
> And I see non bug fixing commits going through.
Hi Bogd
El Tuesday 10 June 2008 14:40:33 Thiago Maluf escribió:
> Hi List,
>
> When I have one call established with UA1 and UA2 and UA1 would like
> to transfer this call to UA3.
> Then this user put UA2 in hold and call to UA3. After this new call is
> established then UA1 send one REFER request to UA3 a
Hi List,
When I have one call established with UA1 and UA2 and UA1 would like
to transfer this call to UA3.
Then this user put UA2 in hold and call to UA3. After this new call is
established then UA1 send one REFER request to UA3 ask for he to
established the call with UA2.
I would like know what
Hi there,
Is the SVN frozen or not? The announced date was for 6th of June and
there is an ongoing discussion about pre-longing this date or not, but
there was no decision yet announced.
And I see non bug fixing commits going through.
Regards,
Bogdan
_
Revision: 4353
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4353&view=rev
Author: miconda
Date: 2008-06-10 04:52:37 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- forgot to update doc after last commit changes
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/gflags/README
Revision: 4352
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4352&view=rev
Author: miconda
Date: 2008-06-10 04:48:46 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- functions enabled for LOCAL_ROUTE
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/gflags/gflags.c
This was
Revision: 4351
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4351&view=rev
Author: henningw
Date: 2008-06-10 04:32:39 -0700 (Tue, 10 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- fix several errors in example configuration
- port to new driver names and syntax
Modified Paths:
---
Bugs item #1989672, was opened at 2008-06-10 11:14
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1989672&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Hello Henning,
On 06/09/08 19:36, Henning Westerholt wrote:
> On Monday 09 June 2008, Dan Pascu wrote:
>
>>> OK, send_route might be too late for discussion and implementation
>>> without breaking too much the current scheduling. We can focus on the
>>> local_route and review the modules that c
Hi guys,
please let's continue this discussion (about setting new rules) on the
separate thread I create especially for this topic - it will be more
clear and nobody will complain later that he was not aware of this
discussion
Thanks and Regards,
Bogdan
Henning Westerholt wrote:
>
> On Monday
On Monday 09 June 2008, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> > How much a developer gets involved in the project is his own decision -
> > but we should not bring everything to a stale just because we need to go
> > to each developer to ask for an opinion.
> > IMO this must work like a PUSH and not like PULL
Hi Juha,
This is fine with me - should we split new modules versus design and
arch changes? or keep them together under the same umbrella ?
Regards,
Bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
>
> > - Major commits (new modules, design and architectural changes) no
> > soon
41 matches
Mail list logo
