Bugs item #1998765, was opened at 2008-06-20 09:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by osas
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1998765&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thre
Bugs item #1998765, was opened at 2008-06-20 09:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by smullen27
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1998765&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #1998765, was opened at 2008-06-20 09:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by osas
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1998765&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thre
Bugs item #1998833, was opened at 2008-06-20 14:57
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1998833&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Revision: 4409
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4409&view=rev
Author: juhe
Date: 2008-06-20 07:21:53 -0700 (Fri, 20 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
* Added link to sample FreeRADIUS configuration files for peering
broker.
Modified Paths:
--
trun
Dan Pascu schrieb:
> On Friday 20 June 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> Dan Pascu schrieb:
>>> On Thursday 19 June 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Dan!
Dan Pascu schrieb:
...
> operators do not work in all cases? What about the TLS
> implementation which is practical
Bugs item #1998765, was opened at 2008-06-20 09:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1998765&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Hello Dan,
I'm using:
encode_contact()
decode_contact()
decode_contact_header()
Maybe we should move these three functions into the textops module.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Dan Pascu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 20 June 2008, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> Hello Dan,
Hello Bogdan,
>From a PSTN point of view, a channel is allocated right at the
beginning of the call (before ringing)
If I have a gateway that if offering me 1000 channels and I don't want
to saturate the gateway, I need to add channels to the profile right
after the INVITE is sent and decrement th
Hi Ovidiu,
why don't you add the dialog to the profile when you receive the 200 OK
in reply route ?
Regards,
Bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> Hello Bogdan,
>
> I started to play with the new profiling feature and tested a few scenarios.
>
> Scenario 1:
> UserA calls UserB. UserB has call forward no
Hi Henning,
To be honest, I expect something more straightforward (and not
ambiguous). The rule we have so far says commits (what ever they are)
are allowed before the freeze. And people got mad with commits too close
to the freeze.
So, let's try to agree on some terms that will make our l
Actually this is a very good question.
We are in a quite strange situation as we do not know what the current
status is, we do not know what the current work is and we do not know
what the plans are
This ambiguous situation simply blocks the release process and I expect
the people responsiv
Hi Daniel,
To summarize :
1) script flag - indeed there is an issue there and fortunately the fix
trivial - please open a bug report just not to forget about it
2) branch and branch_flags related function - these are not intended to
be used in local route as it makes no sense. As, said, the c
Hi guys,
I agree that the mangler module must be removed and I think that the
functionality it contains and it is not present in other modules should
be moved in the existing modules:
- textops
- nattraversal
-path
, depending on each one...
Regards,
Bogdan
Dan Pascu wrote:
> On F
Hi Dan,
I have to admit I haven't went to deep into the function to see exactly
what types of tests are done - I assumed that more or less are the same
as in nathelper.
Anyhow, you still have the test for private ip in Contact, I guess - and
if you have an AS that is generating some INVITEs, ma
On Friday 20 June 2008, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> I am still using this module in deployments with registrars that does
> not support the path extension.
What functions do you use from the module? Anything usefull from the
module should be moved to the other nat related modules, since ma
On Friday 20 June 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Dan Pascu schrieb:
> > On Thursday 19 June 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> >> Hi Dan!
> >>
> >> Dan Pascu schrieb:
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> operators do not work in all cases? What about the TLS
> >>> implementation which is practically useless for end user
Dan Pascu schrieb:
> On Thursday 19 June 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> Hi Dan!
>>
>> Dan Pascu schrieb:
>> ...
>>
>>> operators do not work in all cases? What about the TLS implementation
>>> which is practically useless for end user devices, and even for proxy
>>> to proxy connections can rende
Bugs item #1996441, was opened at 2008-06-17 22:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by klaus_darilion
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1996441&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the co
Revision: 4408
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4408&view=rev
Author: klaus_darilion
Date: 2008-06-20 01:03:26 -0700 (Fri, 20 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
- added a note to the documentation about t_check_trans()
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/module
20 matches
Mail list logo
