Dan Pascu writes:
> I'm really intrigued by this stance. If something has/had bugs, it means
> it is a bad idea?
dan,
my post was not intended to offense anyone. i just noticed a fact and
was wondering why dialog module has had more problems than other
modules.
-- juha
Stefan and Atle,
Yes, it's very interesting work indeed, thank you for publishing it.
Stefan Sayer wrote:
> [sorry if you receive this mail multiple times on multiple mailing list
> - I thought people on (open)serdev might be interested, but not
> necessarily subscribed to rtpproxy lists]
>
On Friday 11 July 2008, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> many of the bugs are dialog module related. i remember also in the
> past that dialog module has had lots of issues. what is the
> conclusion? is it really a good idea for proxy to know about dialogs?
I'm really intrigued by this stance. If somethi
I use the dialog module in my production systems, and would be very
disappointed to see that functionality deprecated.
--
kobi
On Jul 11, 2008, at 9:04 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> many of the bugs are dialog module related. i remember also in the
> past
> that dialog module has had lots of i
El Friday 11 July 2008 18:43:35 Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió:
> El Friday 11 July 2008 17:58:59 Juha Heinanen escribió:
> > can you point to an rfc that tells that case of privacy value does not
> > matter?
>
> Hi Juha,
>
> All BNF grammar in SIP is case insensitive except common methods name:
>
> M
El Friday 11 July 2008 17:58:59 Juha Heinanen escribió:
> can you point to an rfc that tells that case of privacy value does not
> matter?
Hi Juha,
All BNF grammar in SIP is case insensitive except common methods name:
Method =INVITEm / ACKm / OPTIONSm
/ BYEm / CANCELm / REGISTERm
/ INFO
Henning Westerholt writes:
> according to RFC 2234, section 2.3 are terminal values enclosed in strings
> defined as case-insensitive. Both 3261 and 3325 referring to this syntax
> definition. I also read some discussion on sip-implementors about this [1].
> So i thought the patch is correc
Revision: 4482
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4482&view=rev
Author: henningw
Date: 2008-07-11 09:28:05 -0700 (Fri, 11 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
---
- various cleanups and checks added
- move mysql command definition to own include file
- cleanups some conf
On Friday 11 July 2008, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> can you point to an rfc that tells that case of privacy value does not
> matter?
Hi Juha,
according to RFC 2234, section 2.3 are terminal values enclosed in strings
defined as case-insensitive. Both 3261 and 3325 referring to this syntax
definition
I think it is, but of course, we need more testing on it and fix all
the remaining bugs.
There are some really cool features that can be implemented using the
dialog module.
Because of that, between releases, the dialog module was under heavy
development and therefore bugs are expected.
-- ovidi
many of the bugs are dialog module related. i remember also in the past
that dialog module has had lots of issues. what is the conclusion? is
it really a good idea for proxy to know about dialogs?
-- juha
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.openser.or
Bayan Towfiq writes:
> The privacy parser is case sensitive, only accepting lowercase privacy
> values which causes problems for headers such as:
>
> "Privacy: Id"
> or
> "Privacy: ID"
>
> only
> "Privacy: id"
> would be accepted.
can you point to an rfc that tells that case of priv
On Friday 11 July 2008, Bayan Towfiq wrote:
> The privacy parser is case sensitive, only accepting lowercase privacy
> values which causes problems for headers such as:
>
> "Privacy: Id"
> or
> "Privacy: ID"
>
> only
> "Privacy: id"
> would be accepted.
> [..]
Hi Bayan,
thanks for the patch. You'
Revision: 4481
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4481&view=rev
Author: henningw
Date: 2008-07-11 07:13:26 -0700 (Fri, 11 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
---
- fix privacy and URI user parameter parser, they should handled
case-insensitive
- reported from Bayan Towfiq
We have another issue related to the presence server, we will add it
today.
Adrian
On Jul 11, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Henning Westerholt wrote:
On Friday 04 July 2008, Henning Westerholt wrote:
[bugs]
Hi all,
the current bug situation against the trunk and 1.3 branch, actual
count 29.
Core
Bugs item #2002156, was opened at 2008-06-25 01:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ibc_sf
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=2002156&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment th
On Friday 04 July 2008, Dan Pascu wrote:
> There are at least 2 others, which I privately discussed with Bogdan and
> he said he will fix them:
>
> 1. Wrong Route set for the BYEs generated by the dialog module.
> 2. E2E ACKs that end in the proxy are not recognized as such and do not
> trigger the
On Friday 04 July 2008, Henning Westerholt wrote:
> [bugs]
Hi all,
the current bug situation against the trunk and 1.3 branch, actual count 29.
Core:
1912575Core dump in xmlrpc server
1899005Crash during CANCEL
1983626Openser Memory Corruption
1934375force_send_socket not working
Bugs item #2002156, was opened at 2008-06-24 23:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by henningw
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=2002156&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Revision: 4480
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4480&view=rev
Author: henningw
Date: 2008-07-11 05:31:07 -0700 (Fri, 11 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
---
- force_rport() also add a recieved parameter every time to the VIA
- this is necessary to be RFC 3581 compliant
Bugs item #1969445, was opened at 2008-05-22 09:09
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by henningw
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1969445&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comme
Bugs item #1854174, was opened at 2007-12-19 15:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by henningw
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1854174&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #2015899, was opened at 2008-07-11 10:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=2015899&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Bugs item #2015897, was opened at 2008-07-11 10:36
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=2015897&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
The privacy parser is case sensitive, only accepting lowercase privacy
values which causes problems for headers such as:
"Privacy: Id"
or
"Privacy: ID"
only
"Privacy: id"
would be accepted.
I've attached a diff that fixes this for trunk.
Also see that in the parser strncmp is used in msg_pars
Revision: 4479
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4479&view=rev
Author: henningw
Date: 2008-07-11 02:17:26 -0700 (Fri, 11 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
---
- extend permissions test, check also allow_trusted (related to #1925738),
some small cleanups
Modified Paths
Bugs item #1925738, was opened at 2008-03-26 02:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by henningw
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1925738&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Revision: 4478
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4478&view=rev
Author: henningw
Date: 2008-07-11 02:04:50 -0700 (Fri, 11 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
---
- DB documentation fix, generate the DEFAULT column value as empty string
Modified Paths:
--
br
Revision: 4477
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4477&view=rev
Author: henningw
Date: 2008-07-11 02:00:24 -0700 (Fri, 11 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
---
- fix wrong db_berkeley version table, this was changed accidentally
in rev4331
Revision Links:
-
29 matches
Mail list logo
