On Friday 12 December 2008, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> > B) PATH extension
> >
> > First of all if PATH is used and simply UDP ping is used, nathelper
> > pings the source of the REGISTER (where it came from).
> > Question: does this make sense? as anyhow the INVITEs will be sent to
> > the top PA
On Thursday 11 December 2008, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was evaluating an implementation for NAT pinging also via TCP
> connection, but I just diging in the current pinging "logic" I found
> some issues that needs to be sorted out first.
>
> B) PATH extension
>
> First of all if PATH i
On Thursday 11 December 2008, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
> Dan Pascu wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 December 2008, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
> >> Which of those are you exactly missing with SER?
> >
> > You are offtopic. This is an OpenSIPS mailing list. Please post your
> > SER related questions to the SER mailing l
Revision: 5061
http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=5061&view=rev
Author: dan_pascu
Date: 2008-12-16 05:53:37 + (Tue, 16 Dec 2008)
Log Message:
---
Fixed bug in dialog loading logic that resulted in segfault when more than
DIALOG_FETCH_SIZE dialogs were lo
Revision: 5060
http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=5060&view=rev
Author: dan_pascu
Date: 2008-12-16 05:52:38 + (Tue, 16 Dec 2008)
Log Message:
---
Fixed bug in dialog loading logic that resulted in segfault when more than
DIALOG_FETCH_SIZE dialogs were lo
Bugs item #2431628, was opened at 2008-12-15 21:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ibc_sf
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2431628&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment t
Bugs item #2431628, was opened at 2008-12-15 21:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ibc_sf
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2431628&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment t
Bugs item #2431628, was opened at 2008-12-15 21:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ibc_sf
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2431628&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment t
Bugs item #2431628, was opened at 2008-12-15 21:02
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2431628&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Bugs item #2335003, was opened at 2008-11-23 22:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ibc_sf
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2335003&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment t
El Lunes, 15 de Diciembre de 2008, Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió:
> I attach a gdb output of the coredump in teh above scenario:
> - OpenSips starts as presence server (no more).
> - Presence tables were emptied.
> - A client sends variosPUBLISH/SUBSCRIBE's.
> - OpenSIPS crashes.
>
> I'll try to cap
Bugs item #2431561, was opened at 2008-12-15 20:20
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ibc_sf
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2431561&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment t
Bugs item #2431561, was opened at 2008-12-15 20:20
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2431561&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
El Lunes, 15 de Diciembre de 2008, Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió:
> > Are you sure you have not corrupted the database? Can you please start
> > fresh: stop the server, empty database tables, start the server again.
>
> Now I've separed the presence server in other host (the same in fact, but
> other
El Miércoles, 10 de Diciembre de 2008, Anca Vamanu escribió:
> Are you sure you have not corrupted the database? Can you please start
> fresh: stop the server, empty database tables, start the server again.
Now I've separed the presence server in other host (the same in fact, but
other OpenSIPS l
El Lunes, 15 de Diciembre de 2008, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu escribió:
> Hi Iñaki,
>
> But, based on the mysql logs, what is the last query performed by proc
> 23847 before generating the "out of sync" errors?
>
> The error from 23846 is not related as each process uses a dedicated
> mysql connection to
Bugs item #2430807, was opened at 2008-12-15 13:04
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anca_vamanu
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2430807&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comm
Revision: 5059
http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=5059&view=rev
Author: anca_vamanu
Date: 2008-12-15 14:07:34 + (Mon, 15 Dec 2008)
Log Message:
---
- fixed a bug that caused segmentation fault, related to bug item #2430807
Modified Paths:
--
Bugs item #2430988, was opened at 2008-12-15 19:06
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by rmnathan
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2430988&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comm
Bugs item #2431009, was opened at 2008-12-15 19:26
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by rmnathan
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2431009&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comm
Bugs item #2431009, was opened at 2008-12-15 19:26
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2431009&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Hi Iñaki,
But, based on the mysql logs, what is the last query performed by proc
23847 before generating the "out of sync" errors?
The error from 23846 is not related as each process uses a dedicated
mysql connection to server.
Regards,
Bogdan
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2008/12/10 Iñaki Baz
Bugs item #2430988, was opened at 2008-12-15 19:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmnathan
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2430988&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #2430988, was opened at 2008-12-15 19:06
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2430988&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
El Lunes, 15 de Diciembre de 2008, Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió:
> El Miércoles, 10 de Diciembre de 2008, Anca Vamanu escribió:
> > I have been running simple presence server with pua_usrloc with an
> > expireses of 60 for half an hour now and have not experienced the crash
> > yet.
> > Are you sure
Bugs item #2430863, was opened at 2008-12-15 14:03
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by bogdan_iancu
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2430863&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Bugs item #2430863, was opened at 2008-12-15 17:33
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2430863&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
El Miércoles, 10 de Diciembre de 2008, Anca Vamanu escribió:
> I have been running simple presence server with pua_usrloc with an
> expireses of 60 for half an hour now and have not experienced the crash
> yet.
> Are you sure you have not corrupted the database? Can you please start
> fresh: stop t
Bugs item #2430807, was opened at 2008-12-15 16:34
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmnathan
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2430807&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2008/12/12 Jesus Rodriguez :
>
>>> So, the question is: if NAT detected and such a protocol mismatch is
>>> detected, should a registrar refuse the registration (as it will be
>>> anyhow unusable) ?
>>>
>> Maybe this could be a configurable policy via modparam
Hi Iñaki,
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2008/12/11 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu :
>
>
>> A) contact info versus network info
>>
>> When considering a REGISTER request, you have two sets of information: I
>> - registered contact ; II - network info (source IP/port, proto, local
>> socket where the request
Bugs item #2430807, was opened at 2008-12-15 16:34
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=2430807&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
As I'm going to code the handler for resource-list tag, I've just seen that
comment :
/* support only for list - ignore resource-list children */
Is it any particular reason/issue which explains why resource-list is not
implemented ?
Thanks,
Eric.
2008/12/14 Eric PTAK
> I forward this mail wi
Hi Maxim,
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>> A) contact info versus network info
>>
>> When considering a REGISTER request, you have two sets of
>> information: I - registered contact ; II - network info (source
>> IP/port, proto, local socket where the request was received on)
Hi Jesus,
Jesus Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
>> I was evaluating an implementation for NAT pinging also via TCP
>> connection, but I just diging in the current pinging "logic" I found
>> some issues that needs to be sorted out first.
>>
>> So, let's start from the presumption you do NAT pinging
35 matches
Mail list logo
