Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] SF.net SVN: opensips:[6754] branches/1.6/modules/presence/notify.c

2010-09-23 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Hello Anca, The 'linksys' enhancement to the presence module works ok if fallback2db is enabled. If fallback2db is disabled, the body without any dialog is not attached to the NOTIFY message. The attached patch is enabling the 'linksys' enhancement in fallback2db disabled mode. Regards, Ovidiu Sa

[OpenSIPS-Devel] SF.net SVN: opensips:[7233] trunk/modules/nathelper

2010-09-23 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Revision: 7233 http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=7233&view=rev Author: osas Date: 2010-09-23 16:58:35 + (Thu, 23 Sep 2010) Log Message: --- nathelper: obsolete flag 's' removed Modified Paths: -- trunk/modules/nathelper/README trunk/

[OpenSIPS-Devel] SF.net SVN: opensips:[7232] trunk/modules/nathelper

2010-09-23 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Revision: 7232 http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=7232&view=rev Author: osas Date: 2010-09-23 15:13:16 + (Thu, 23 Sep 2010) Log Message: --- nathelper: removing obsolete force_rtp_proxy function - force_rtp_proxy is obsolete by rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_a

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS-Users] nathelper: removal of force_rtp_proxy

2010-09-23 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Excellent. We are making progress here. Later on, we will need to break the nathelper module in two: - nathelper: dealing with NAT related issues - rtpproxy - connector to the rtpproxy server Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Ovidiu, > > haven

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] nathelper: removal of force_rtp_proxy

2010-09-23 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Ovidiu, haven't yet migrated, but I do not foresee issues with that - I will adapt :) Regards, Bogdan Ovidiu Sas wrote: > Should I understand that all rtpproxy users have switched to > rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer? > If there are no objections, sometimes next week I will remove the old > forc

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] nathelper: removal of force_rtp_proxy

2010-09-23 Thread Emmanuel BUU
Ouch ! Still using it but on 1.5. I guess that I will adapt when going to 1.6 Le 22/09/10 20:31, Ovidiu Sas a écrit : > Should I understand that all rtpproxy users have switched to > rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer? > If there are no objections, sometimes next week I will remove the old > force_