The dialog module requires the server to ruin in proxy mode.
The b2b modules are not running in proxy mode (there are different
transactions for the received message and the sent message).
In fact, the config for b2b should be very simple (see the one posed
on the tutorial page).
Regards,
Ovidiu S
Hi, Ovidiu.
Could you explain why mixing dialog and b2b isn't a good
idea?
I think this should be written in docs in red color.
Do you want to see full config?
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:21:31 -0500
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
It seems that you are mixing dialog with b2b, which is
not a good idea.
The
Revision: 7779
http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=7779&view=rev
Author: osas
Date: 2011-03-04 17:56:59 + (Fri, 04 Mar 2011)
Log Message:
---
b2b_logic: updated README file for "b2bl_from_param_spec" param
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/
It seems that you are mixing dialog with b2b, which is not a good idea.
The issue that you are having here has nothing to do with my change.
Can you post your config?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
2011/3/4 Anton Zagorskiy :
> Full debug log for this call is 303Kb. Do you really need it all :) ?
>
>
> Sho
Full debug log for this call is 303Kb. Do you really need it all :) ?
Shortly, on BYE request:
[25509]: DBG:uac:restore_uri: Dialog found: 0x80416a818
[25509]: DBG:dialog:fetch_dlg_value: looking for
[25509]: DBG:dialog:fetch_dlg_value: var found-> <>!
[25509]: DBG:rr:is_direction: param ftag n
Revision: 7778
http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=7778&view=rev
Author: osas
Date: 2011-03-04 16:06:16 + (Fri, 04 Mar 2011)
Log Message:
---
b2b_logic: fix detection of empty PV for "b2bl_from_spec_param"
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/
That's strange. Can you post your full debug logs?
I have tested the following scenarios and all worked ok for me:
1. param not defined
2. param defined and not set
3. param defined and set
On scenario 2 there is a small issue (an error is printed out about
the PV not being a uri) but all the
Hi, Ovidiu.
I've just got the latest svn trunk and got that situation without changing
any parameters.
> -Original Message-
> From: sip.n...@gmail.com [mailto:sip.n...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Ovidiu Sas
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 6:16 PM
> To: OpenSIPS devel mailling list
> Cc: A
Revision:
http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2011-03-04 15:16:22 + (Fri, 04 Mar 2011)
Log Message:
---
backport from trunk (rev #7776):
- fixed ugly dangling pointer when using the use_next_gw() function. Beca
Are you saying that you set up the "b2bl_from_spec_param" and you got an error?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Anton Zagorskiy
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I think it is you fix: I'm using top hiding and on BYE request b2b sends in
> the lo interface BYE request with extra zeroes in a
Revision: 7776
http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=7776&view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2011-03-04 15:14:46 + (Fri, 04 Mar 2011)
Log Message:
---
- fixed ugly dangling pointer when using the use_next_gw() function. Because of
this, the newly set RURI
Hi.
I think it is you fix: I'm using top hiding and on BYE request b2b sends in
the lo interface BYE request with extra zeroes in a FROM header.
Like this: From: "xxx"
> -Original Message-
> From: devel-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:devel-
> boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf O
Bugs item #3182321, was opened at 2011-02-15 09:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by denodaeus
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=3182321&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the commen
13 matches
Mail list logo
