@wdoekes , what about a different approach on this matter - instead of keep
filtering per IP each time we want to ping, what about using a server ID and
each usrloc should be marked with such ID representing the server which did
handle that register ? So, at the end, whatever number of
Well, adding something particular to GMT is simple and fast, but hackish
What about extending $time(format) to $time([tz:]format) ?? and similar we can
do for $Tf, like $Tf(tz) ?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Hi Bogdan:
yea, $time([tz:]format) that a best way.
zhouxiaoqiang.mst...@gmail.com
From: Bogdan Andrei IANCU
Date: 2014-11-04 16:38
To: OpenSIPS/opensips
CC: xiaoqiang.zhou
Subject: Re: [opensips] date format convert method that use in opensips.cfg
(#378)
Well, adding
Hi @bogdan-iancu you are right, I only need pua for pua_dialoginfo and
pua_usrloc. Include presence modules was my mistake, are not necesary, thanks
for the point.
Nowadays i think your patch is essential because avoid the crash, I will apply
it.
Thank you so much
---
Reply to this email
Closed #382.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/382#event-187888632___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
it is nice.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/378#issuecomment-61610116___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
That would suit my needs indeed; and make more sense than the awkward query
that we do now.
Thinking out loud here: where do we get this ID from? Do we add a `server_id`
integer parameter to `usrloc`? Or should we generate one automatically? If we
use a parameter and default it to `1`, we get
Hi @bogdan-iancu , I'm using oficial packages of debian 7.7 (x86_64), but i
have no idea if libxmlrpc-core-c3 is compiled with multi-process support or
not, I can't find the info in debian docs.
I'm testing now mi_xmlrpc_ng as you suggested and things seems to be right in
my test machine. I
Closed #341.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/341#event-187956474___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
This was merged in commit 10083ed78db1d8c93288f0a90d2cdd42e5168f52
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/341#issuecomment-61625430___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
AFAIK, libxmlrpc-c3 is by default compiled with threads support - we had a long
struggle with that.
Please run tests with mi_xmlrpc_ng and report if you find any issues (open
other tickets for that, I will close this one).
In 2.1, the mi_xlmrpc will become obsolete and removed.
---
Reply to
Closed #379.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/379#event-187961666___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 5ade2ad12f26d13406f1eccba53653464fa93a17
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/5ade2ad12f26d13406f1eccba53653464fa93a17
Author: ionutrazvanionita ionution...@opensips.org
Date: 2014-11-04 (Tue,
Hi Ovidiu,
Just finished working fixing this bug. Hope multilist will work fine now.
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/b994ddff6a9f976d020634551e06a101ef8730db
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Thanks a lot, I'm sure it will do the trick. I'll apply the patch to 1.11.
I close this request. Thank you again!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/380#issuecomment-61643355___
Devel
Closed #380.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/380#event-188027309___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
@bogdan-iancu, yea, it's good for older versions. We ran it on 1.8 for a long
time.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/366#issuecomment-61731912___
Devel mailing list
Branch: refs/heads/1.11
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: de90f8b94c3e6df01a7a70285dbe91dac76231fe
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/de90f8b94c3e6df01a7a70285dbe91dac76231fe
Author: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bog...@opensips.org
Date: 2014-11-05 (Wed, 05
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 4c9a1fa2a791d37629b7272581f6d52c4b0f9666
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/4c9a1fa2a791d37629b7272581f6d52c4b0f9666
Author: David Sanders dsander...@ucsbalum.com
Date: 2014-11-05 (Wed, 05
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
ok, done
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/366#issuecomment-61768218___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Branch: refs/heads/1.11
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 36ad430f0bf50bb20fcdfd1180c9262348e41f79
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/36ad430f0bf50bb20fcdfd1180c9262348e41f79
Author: David Sanders dsander...@ucsbalum.com
Date: 2014-11-05 (Wed, 05 Nov
Branch: refs/heads/1.8
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 346029318e9c9aab4019e29f4c9204e7c1a69bce
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/346029318e9c9aab4019e29f4c9204e7c1a69bce
Author: David Sanders dsander...@ucsbalum.com
Date: 2014-11-05 (Wed, 05 Nov
@wdoekes , I'm seeing this from a larger perspective - we are working on the
specs/description for a cluster module - to ensure registration and call
exchange (in a transparent way) between several opensips instances. So, we will
define a server ID for each opensips (an ID inside the cluster),
24 matches
Mail list logo
