@etamme, I was thinking of a function to use in script -
set_preferred_proto(list). If you do not want any fallback, simply put one
proto in the list :) . And if a function, this can be used in a more flexible
way comparing with global params.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on
Hi @etamme - is there any chance to get access to that server for
troubleshooting ? This will be the fastest way to get this solved.
Thanks, Bogdan
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 8dfe15e3ced61d959530bf25c3751d6707f1ed70
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/8dfe15e3ced61d959530bf25c3751d6707f1ed70
Author: Liviu Chircu li...@opensips.org
Date: 2015-03-05 (Thu, 05 Mar
Closed #419.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/419#event-246611137___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi @jamesabravo , thanks for the fix. The NO_ZERO_CHECKS checks were dropped in
2.1 as they does not make too much of a sense anymore.
So, I completely removed them from 1.11, 1.10 and 1.8 too.
Thanks and regards,
Bogdan
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Branch: refs/heads/1.8
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 84393238d76972c34892a67f85fab8315e3cf343
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/84393238d76972c34892a67f85fab8315e3cf343
Author: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bog...@opensips.org
Date: 2015-03-05 (Thu, 05 Mar
Branch: refs/heads/1.10
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: b2f3658497946498aa804d07961f5ef69e6db781
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/b2f3658497946498aa804d07961f5ef69e6db781
Author: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bog...@opensips.org
Date: 2015-03-05 (Thu, 05
Thanks.
Are u sure about removing lines 377-383 in udp_server.c ? You probably know
the code a lot better then be, I was just concerned that probing packets
(usually 4 zero's) will upset things further ok?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Bogdan Andrei IANCU
notificati...@github.com wrote:
Hi
Branch: refs/heads/1.11
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 5daef76d3eb7848330b0b21c15163b58dcb985a5
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/5daef76d3eb7848330b0b21c15163b58dcb985a5
Author: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bog...@opensips.org
Date: 2015-03-05 (Thu, 05
Branch: refs/heads/1.10
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: aeb3519a577932e817f4f981c1d6fee0e2a7637e
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/aeb3519a577932e817f4f981c1d6fee0e2a7637e
Author: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bog...@opensips.org
Date: 2015-03-05 (Thu, 05
Branch: refs/heads/1.11
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 96aca846c4f8b208088691bd43881c60d8ce1fe9
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/96aca846c4f8b208088691bd43881c60d8ce1fe9
Author: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bog...@opensips.org
Date: 2015-03-05 (Thu, 05
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 60d2473979d2a6a5e56ee5d87e48db67e6e1b877
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/60d2473979d2a6a5e56ee5d87e48db67e6e1b877
Author: Liviu Chircu li...@opensips.org
Date: 2015-03-05 (Thu, 05 Mar
Branch: refs/heads/1.10
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: bb53e6cb07d5bdc1e6eb2f8446fd54e393728c36
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/bb53e6cb07d5bdc1e6eb2f8446fd54e393728c36
Author: Liviu Chircu li...@opensips.org
Date: 2015-03-05 (Thu, 05 Mar 2015)
Hi, let me explain first how things do work, and then we can see how to change
:) - I agree that things may be simpler (for user understanding/usage) and may
be improved.
So, right now the outgoing protocol is determined based on next hop URI and the
set network socket. What @oteren said is
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 4efeba5bafe482215ac8c42b8af92d4107bb94cc
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/4efeba5bafe482215ac8c42b8af92d4107bb94cc
Author: Liviu Chircu li...@opensips.org
Date: 2015-03-05 (Thu, 05 Mar
The event E_PRESENCE_PUBLISH will be triggered each time the presence module
receives a PUBLISH
The parameters of the event are:
user::AOR
domain::domain
event::event_type
expires::int_time_to_expire
etag::etag_string
body::string_with_xml_body_of_publish
You can view, comment on, or merge this
Updated *Global Parameter* and *Escape Sequences* sections all the way down to
OpenSIPS 1.8. Thank you for reporting!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/422#issuecomment-77356587___
Devel
Closed #422.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/422#event-246728267___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 08023112b8b3bbb9643dba27ff8d4f4f6448fc13
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/08023112b8b3bbb9643dba27ff8d4f4f6448fc13
Author: Vlad Paiu vladp...@opensips.org
Date: 2015-03-05 (Thu, 05 Mar
@etamme, whatever the script is, you should not get such errors, especially
without the traffic. Is that the only kind of warn you get from the timer
subsystem ?
Do you get that message in a consistent way or from time to time ?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
You and be both. Take care
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Bogdan Andrei IANCU
notificati...@github.com wrote:
@jamesabravo https://github.com/jamesabravo you saved me !!! thank you
!! my intention was to remove the define only, not the code inside of
it.guess I need a coffee ;).
Best
Hi @rshpount - it seems they are not documented in the Global Parameter
section. Thank you for the heads up, we will fixit asap.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Branch: refs/heads/1.8
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: cb466725126adffbef455e78345b4e6e07539e85
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/cb466725126adffbef455e78345b4e6e07539e85
Author: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bog...@opensips.org
Date: 2015-03-05 (Thu, 05 Mar
Can you also write documentation for this new event triggered? After that I
will merge it in the master branch.
Thanks,
Răzvan
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@bogdan-iancu the warnings happen all the time, but I can not see any
particular interval to them.
I did 'grep timer /var/log/opensips' and made a gist of the last 24 hours
https://gist.github.com/etamme/a75198a5590c22bfa574
This box is litereally sitting idle - I have one UA that I am
If there is a preference for UDP, and an SRV lookup is done with no result, I
would still want to fall through and attempt a TCP SRV lookup. It seems like
this SHOULD be the way things work.
If there is a parameter to place preference on one protocol vs. the other I
would still want the fall
Branch: refs/heads/1.11
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 960076cfb3887542b76fa01159558629adfe668f
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/960076cfb3887542b76fa01159558629adfe668f
Author: Liviu Chircu li...@opensips.org
Date: 2015-03-05 (Thu, 05 Mar 2015)
27 matches
Mail list logo
