This issue is only occuring when there is a route header, an example route
header from on of the UA experiencing the issue is:
Route:
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/452#issuecomment-91322883
Following some investigation, the difference in behaviour comes from the
presence (or lack) of a pre-loaded Route header. This header points to a TLS
interface, making opensips (while handling the preload route) to force a TLS
send socket . According to #420, if no proto is dictated by RURI, the
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: baa342d0ce1ed80195058da4262aa370418bc03b
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/baa342d0ce1ed80195058da4262aa370418bc03b
Author: ionutrazvanionita
Date: 2015-04-09 (Thu, 09 Apr 2015)
Changed p
@olivermt , that is good news - I suggest closing this as bug and opening a
feature request with the ability to specify multiple protos (for fallback). Is
that ok ?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/420#issuecomment-91283835___
@dsandras , please open a bug report on this matter, so we have it on the radar
for fixing.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/446#issuecomment-91279243___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.open
We had some long discussions about TCP and the aliasing ...here are some
conclusions:
1) You have 2 types of entities involved: network level (ip:port) and SIP level
(SIP uris).
2) in SIP, the next hop (upstream or downstream) can be different on network
and SIP level: even if I received the I
Closed #446.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/446#event-277328795___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: d506309346b8beb402cc5a5bd64b84977a4e336f
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/d506309346b8beb402cc5a5bd64b84977a4e336f
Author: Jarrod Baumann
Date: 2015-04-08 (Wed, 08 Apr 2015)
Changed path
Thank you !!!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/456#issuecomment-91271029___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Merged #456.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/456#event-277306575___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Branch: refs/heads/2.1
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 5863cda406dff23134dfb4e45a49a409145851ee
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/5863cda406dff23134dfb4e45a49a409145851ee
Author: Razvan Crainea
Date: 2015-04-09 (Thu, 09 Apr 2015)
Changed paths:
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 7e1bded0fab67eb5a3174befc19710807d0b4a46
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/7e1bded0fab67eb5a3174befc19710807d0b4a46
Author: Razvan Crainea
Date: 2015-04-09 (Thu, 09 Apr 2015)
Changed path
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 7bea2adbe700a1b7d896a0bcbf7cfd754821
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/7bea2adbe700a1b7d896a0bcbf7cfd754821
Author: ionutrazvanionita
Date: 2015-04-09 (Thu, 09 Apr 2015)
Changed p
This came up when I was doing some rollout to production with pike module.
Some actual customers were getting pike blocked, and I wanted to unblock them.
Jarrod decided to code it up after we talked about it.
We ended up having to put an iptables rule in to drop the customer entirely,
then re
Shouldn't be a better approach to reset the red flag and the counters instead
of actually removing the tree node?
Thanks, bogdan
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/456#issuecomment-91239388_
Awesome!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/456#issuecomment-91231595___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 9dd26b84622e25ff285b336f974ad92bc51471ed
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/9dd26b84622e25ff285b336f974ad92bc51471ed
Author: Răzvan Crainea
Date: 2015-04-09 (Thu, 09 Apr 2015)
Changed path
force_send_socket() seems to work as it should!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/420#issuecomment-91189643___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/
18 matches
Mail list logo
