Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Opensips Crash, presentity Module (#646)

2015-10-14 Thread Răzvan Crainea
Unfortunately I still can't see anything. Can you tell me what debug level are you running? Also, are you sure that the core you have posted the logs for is the only one? Are you also generating pid-based core files (use "echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/core_uses_pid"). Best regards, Răzvan Crainea

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] TLS closing connection under a bit of load (sslv3 alert bad certificate) (#670)

2015-10-14 Thread Răzvan Crainea
Hi, Carlos! Each TLS connection has its own buffer, protected by a locking mechanisms, so I don't see how data might get corrupted. Have you tried taking a wireshark capture to see if Wireshark manages to parse and validate the TLS sessions? Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Core Develo

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] TLS closing connection under a bit of load (sslv3 alert bad certificate) (#670)

2015-10-14 Thread Carlos Oliva
After some tests I was able to reproduce the issue with tls_verify_client = 0 and tls_require_client_certificate = 0 The error now is: "ERROR:core:tls_print_errstack: TLS errstack: error:14094418:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:tlsv1 alert unknown ca" Always is reproducible after some tests with a

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Use the Additional section of SRV queries instead of doing extra requests (#675)

2015-10-14 Thread vladpaiu
Hello, Thanks for the help with this - the record looks fine. Will work on it and update the ticket when it's done. Regards, Vlad --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/675#issuecomment-148023688

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Use the Additional section of SRV queries instead of doing extra requests (#675)

2015-10-14 Thread Tristan F.
Hi @vladpaiu, I just pushed a dummy DNS Server on `new.esya.me` that serves the right format for you; you can try this : ``` # dig _sip._udp.example.org @new.esya.me SRV ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;_sip._udp.example.org. IN SRV ;; ANSWER SECTION: _sip._udp.example.org. 600 IN S

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Use the Additional section of SRV queries instead of doing extra requests (#675)

2015-10-14 Thread Trevor Steyn
Ah sorry i see it does respond with the records :) Trying "_sip._udp.salinux.za.net" Using domain server: Name: 176.9.63.107 Address: 176.9.63.107#53 Aliases: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 27621 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 8 ;; QUESTIO

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Use the Additional section of SRV queries instead of doing extra requests (#675)

2015-10-14 Thread Trevor Steyn
Hi Vlad, You can use the following record, not sure what you need it for as i understand the additional sections show the NS for queried domain. _sip._udp.salinux.za.net The domains don't go anywhere but it should serve your purpose. Trying "_sip._udp.salinux.za.net" ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUE

[OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] SQL Cacher (#676)

2015-10-14 Thread Robert Vladut Patrascu
New module sql_cacher You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/676 -- Commit Summary -- * sql_cacher: full caching in mod_init * sql_cacher: Full caching improvements * sql_cacher: add sql_cached_value pseudo-variable; pars

[OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS/opensips] c0f25f: Added Re-INVITE in-dialog pinging support

2015-10-14 Thread Vlad Paiu
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips Commit: c0f25f796ce3f3ba3066a6d6553bef1ef3823904 https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/c0f25f796ce3f3ba3066a6d6553bef1ef3823904 Author: Vlad Paiu Date: 2015-10-14 (Wed, 14 Oct 2015) Changed paths:

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Use the Additional section of SRV queries instead of doing extra requests (#675)

2015-10-14 Thread vladpaiu
Hello, This would be a great feature to implement - though I can't really find such a SRV record ( with additional records ) out in the wild, in order to have something to test against.. Could you please provide such a SRV DNS record that I can test with ? Best Regards, Vlad --- Reply to this