Branch: refs/heads/3.4
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: b61381fd7c70081852e84c4a3cc3a4724a80d836
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/b61381fd7c70081852e84c4a3cc3a4724a80d836
Author: Peter Lemenkov
Date: 2024-01-04 (Thu, 04 Jan 2024)
Changed paths
Branch: refs/heads/3.2
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 3dbf4f91e092b8ecbb5c15dfcc2bc952b528bd7b
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/3dbf4f91e092b8ecbb5c15dfcc2bc952b528bd7b
Author: Peter Lemenkov
Date: 2024-01-04 (Thu, 04 Jan 2024)
Changed paths
Branch: refs/heads/2.4
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 2a8a9a25a39f37e8df4ea5cfba6df9b413683469
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/2a8a9a25a39f37e8df4ea5cfba6df9b413683469
Author: Peter Lemenkov
Date: 2021-03-15 (Mon, 15 Mar 2021)
Changed paths
Branch: refs/heads/3.1
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 5a4029c2c1cd6a1e97d2ea3e6a44a351354adb5e
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/5a4029c2c1cd6a1e97d2ea3e6a44a351354adb5e
Author: Peter Lemenkov
Date: 2021-03-15 (Mon, 15 Mar 2021)
Changed paths
Branch: refs/heads/3.1
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 78740cf44e8a6db3f1e4771f16dba8fad8fdbdb3
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/78740cf44e8a6db3f1e4771f16dba8fad8fdbdb3
Author: Peter Lemenkov
Date: 2020-09-02 (Wed, 02 Sep 2020)
Changed paths
Branch: refs/heads/2.4
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 27e758dfc0fd6ae40b2157c3535928b721c4b26f
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/27e758dfc0fd6ae40b2157c3535928b721c4b26f
Author: Peter Lemenkov
Date: 2020-07-06 (Mon, 06 Jul 2020)
Changed paths
Branch: refs/heads/3.0
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: d2d09737f274a94029b1d8afa5866ed3d1394914
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/d2d09737f274a94029b1d8afa5866ed3d1394914
Author: Peter Lemenkov
Date: 2020-07-06 (Mon, 06 Jul 2020)
Changed paths
Branch: refs/heads/3.1
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: c9a1c4e6b9834e9bae66dd83aee4391b5515d9dc
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/c9a1c4e6b9834e9bae66dd83aee4391b5515d9dc
Author: Peter Lemenkov
Date: 2020-07-06 (Mon, 06 Jul 2020)
Changed paths
@devjunix thanks for the patch!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/804#issuecomment-189619996___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
At least two places in OpenSIPS where "use UNIVERSAL" is used:
./opensips-1.10.3-tls/modules/perl/lib/perl/OpenSIPS/LDAPUtils/LDAPConnection.pm
55:use UNIVERSAL qw( isa );
188:if( isa($conf ,"OpenSIPS::LDAPUtils::LDAPConnection") ) {
./opensips-1.10.3-tls/modules/perl/lib/perl/OpenSIPS/VDB.pm
Just a note - this is just a docfix, not a code change.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/746#issuecomment-169964275___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/c
Not sure how this slipped through, but we don't have a function called has_sdp.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/746
-- Commit Summary --
* rtpproxy: patch: has_sdp() does not exist
-- File Changes --
M modules/rt
Thanks, @razvancrainea !
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/555#issuecomment-120979868___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Related information. A ticket dedicated to that issue:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190820
I've tried to fix the issue in a
lemenkov/opensips@e06d0587b2b91ae8749450d031a32116da0b7b67 but the proposed
patch was incomplete and later we were hit by a similar issues:
* https://bu
Thanks! Meanwhile there is a bunch of patches with a new functionality and
bugfixes to merge. Stay tuned!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/152#issuecomment-46319784___
Devel mailing list
De
@nikbyte already done - see the latest commits above (
lemenkov/opensips@a11b4091496ebd70b5eac42d3483e7d85d2c71fc )
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/152#issuecomment-39850530___
Devel maili
@DunkyG just install from this link - that's it:
https://wireshark.org/download.html#development-rel
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/189#issuecomment-39447293___
Devel mailing list
Devel
@DunkyG yes, "0" means ok. Btw you can use recent Wireshark version and see
everything in details (just another one attempt of a shameless self-promo).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/189#issuecomment-39446380_
@DunkyG @razvancrainea just fyi - latest devel Wireshark versions contains a
RTPproxy dissector which makes the debugging of the issues like that much more
easier. Please try it!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/189#issuecomment-3
@DunkyG E8 means that session doesn't exist. You have either to create it first
or to pass proper CallID, From/To-tags
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/189#issuecomment-39423290___
Devel
Also I really don't like the direction this discussion is going. Folks, let's
just calm down for a while and focus on a technical issues. I have a plenty of
patches on top of the original module to be reviewed and I'd love to hear any
feedback on them :)
---
Reply to this email directly or view
As for me I really dislike the idea of renaming this module. This module is
named after the protocol, not after the backend. Exactly the same situation
with rtpproxy module - it implements a protocol, not a particular backend
support. One can use rtpproxy module not only with RTPproxy from Sippy
Hello @bogdan-iancu !
First of all do NOT merge it at least during the next few monts - it's stil in
a w.i.p. stage and I see some errors and suspicious warnings during operation.
Also I've got few patches from your twin project to cheryr-pick. Please give me
more time to polish that.
This is
anyone to try it so just fyi.
Sorry for the crossposting.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello All!
I've made some preliminary work on porting rtpproxy-ng from Kamailio to
OpenSIPS. Unfortunately I'm not certain about my patches' quality and
love to get any possible feedback on this. Could anyone please review this and
help me merging it into OpenSIPS? Also any testing will be highl
@bogdan-iancu this looks like duplicate of #114 or vice versa.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/113#issuecomment-30927065___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensi
2013/5/8 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu :
> Revision: 1
GET!
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello All!
2013/4/30 Răzvan Crainea :
> Hi all!
>
> Following the community desires[1] to migrate OpenSIPS repository and
> tracker to Github, we have compiled a schedule[2] for the upcoming weeks.
That's a really great news!
--
With best regard
t;
>
> Does the new tracker have anything like the pull requests mechanism?
No, it doesn't. But it's still much better than the current one.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
x27;s possible to setup a
"primary" repo at SF and "secondary" at GitHub. To be honest I'd
prefer GitHub.
Also I'd like to propose a switch to a new issue tracker at SF.net.
Just compare that one we have to use now with the newest one:
* http://sourceforge.net/p/si
2013/2/18 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu :
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to get some suggestions and help on the matter of migrating the
> code repository from SVN to GIT - the fact that such migration will bring
> value is for sure :)
YES! YES! YES!
--
With best regards,
2013/1/15 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu :
> Makes sense to me, if fine with Peter too.
Yes, that's absolutely fine.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
you
please stop doing so.
If you need to release some critical bugfixes in a 1.8.x branch then
don't be shy - tag it 1.8.3, 1.8.4, and so on.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opens
er ways to return actual
0 from a module's exported function?
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
ready yet - just for the reference)
* https://github.com/lemenkov/OpenSIPS/commit/56b1863
And a complete tree (with unrelated stuff):
* https://github.com/lemenkov/OpenSIPS/commits/1.8.x-ipport
PS I still hope that you will consider switching OpenSIPS to Git someday.
--
Hello All.
It have been added more than a hundred of patches (which is huge)
since tagging 1.8.0. Maybe it's time to release 1.8.1?
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.or
Could you please backport this to 1.8 branch? Looks harmless but handy.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
* Proper (according to LSB) return values
* Explicitly set up PID_file and lock-file
* Check for running OpenSIPs before some operations
Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov
---
packaging/fedora/opensips.init | 39 ++-
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9
-off-by: Peter Lemenkov
---
modules/auth/api.c | 35 ++-
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/auth/api.c b/modules/auth/api.c
index f076e85..ea54f20 100644
--- a/modules/auth/api.c
+++ b/modules/auth/api.c
@@ -215,6 +215,12
39 matches
Mail list logo
