You can offer both GIT and SVN with git-svn [1]. I think that git it's
very more powerful and comfortable to use than subversion.
[1] http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-svn.html
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
Bogdan,
I personally really like SVN. It's widely accepted and well documented. I'm
sure that some newer code repo systems offer some really nice features, but
I'm curious what percent of the community has used newer repo types and
would be comfortable using them to their full potential
Hi Brett,
if you look here http://git.or.cz/course/svn.html, GIT and SVN (at least
from user perspective) are very similar (as concepts and commands too).
I would go for GIT (even if never used it so far), mainly because it is
distributed - sometime SF is slow (when using from europe) and
Hi Fabian,
That is interesting - thanks for the hint ;)
Regards,
Bogdan
Fabián Sellés Rosa wrote:
You can offer both GIT and SVN with git-svn [1]. I think that git it's
very more powerful and comfortable to use than subversion.
[1]
I have found that the speed of mercurial seems to be an issue with
larger sized project.
For example, try downloading adium: hg clone http://hg.adium.im/adium
My vote is for git.
Regards,
Norm
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi everyone,
As we are getting closed to first working code for
