Cinnamon is in GNOME! (In another category - 'll take care later.)
s/gnome/gentoo/ ?
On Jan 10, 2012 8:44 AM, "Sławomir Nizio"
wrote:
> Cinnamon is in GNOME! (In another category - 'll take care later.)
>
>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Ian Whyman wrote:
> s/gnome/gentoo/ ?
> On Jan 10, 2012 8:44 AM, "Sławomir Nizio"
> wrote:
>
>> Cinnamon is in GNOME! (In another category - 'll take care later.)
>>
>>
>
>
>
I think he means - gentoo has added gnome-extra/cinnamon as we
are x11-misc/cinnamon
-
Since it is all still in Limbo I suggest change to gnome-extra too then.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Wolfden wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Ian Whyman wrote:
>>
>> s/gnome/gentoo/ ?
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2012 8:44 AM, "Sławomir Nizio"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Cinnamon is in GNOME! (In
I bumped into a user in IRC pointing out that tty listing (ls -la
/usr/bin) is rather slow on Sabayon.
After a 10 seconds google search I bumped in this article here:
http://gddd.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/ad/
So I've added the command to /etc/default/grub so it looks like:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAUL
I was in a hurry writing it. Yes, Gentoo, not GNOME.
Joost, yep, and it should be done regardless. I'm also going to remove
my ebuild from the overlay so we'll start to use the ebuild from
Portage in order not do maintain two "independent" ones.
2012/1/10, Joost Ruis :
> Since it is all still in L
But we need to brand it
On Jan 10, 2012 5:43 PM, "Sławomir Nizio"
wrote:
> I was in a hurry writing it. Yes, Gentoo, not GNOME.
> Joost, yep, and it should be done regardless. I'm also going to remove
> my ebuild from the overlay so we'll start to use the ebuild from
> Portage in order not do mai
Sure, it can be done as usual, on top of Gentoo's ebuild. (I wasn't too clear.)
2012/1/10, Ian Whyman :
> But we need to brand it
> On Jan 10, 2012 5:43 PM, "Sławomir Nizio"
> wrote:
>
>> I was in a hurry writing it. Yes, Gentoo, not GNOME.
>> Joost, yep, and it should be done regardless. I'm als
