For stability can we get nvidia-drivers-384.98 back in the repo. I'm seeing instability (locking and getting kicked out of KDE, games crashing, black or non-updating screen)
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:19 PM Jerrod Frost <piroisl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Samba bump, if any, could happen after release. No functional changes > really unless we go 4.7, but even those changes are not something a normal > user without a domain and controller would run into it seems. 4.7 does try > to enforce SMB3 usage and discourages SMB1/CIFS for security reasons. > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017, 1:23 PM Joost Ruis <joost.r...@sabayon.org> wrote: > >> I recently bumped nvidia-drivers for Entropy against all kernels and >> wasn't aware that 387.XX is actually a beta version. Just followed what was >> done on our overlay: >> >> >> https://github.com/Sabayon/sabayon-distro/commit/f79f1cf16b1c4d1be390823271710ed73bdae83c >> >> @Francesco any thoughts? >> >> I must say that I didn't have any problems with them on my gaming laptop. >> We hopefully have a newer zfs version available in Entropy, one that also >> supports the 4.14 kernel that is currently in Limbo. >> >> @Ettore should have a say about efivar 0.21 -> 31 && efibootmgr 0.12 -> >> 15. I don't touch them. Same goes for sys-boot/grub. >> >> No opinion about Samba here. If we wanna bump this prior to "the release" >> let me know and I will take care off it. >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:06 PM, SÅ‚awomir Nizio < >> slawomir.ni...@sabayon.org> wrote: >> >>> I can comment on this one for sure: >>> >>> > Samba (not really sure what to do here. CVE-2017-15275,14746,11103, >>> list >>> > goes on an on) we need to be on 4.5.14, but that doesn't cure all the >>> > CVE on samba's page but switching to 4.7.2 is just switching to a list >>> > of unknown vulnerabilities. Is it really beneficial to go from 4.5 to >>> > 4.7? at the very least we should be 4.5.14, but beyond that I'm not >>> sure >>> > how we should proceed or the effort it would take to constantly hop as >>> > samba updates at a pretty fast pace.. Looking for some insight on this >>> > topic. >>> >>> I'm keeping it in the overlay to fix automatic dependency on Ceph. It >>> was fixed in Gentoo in a new version that is not yet stable. >>> >>> I don't see benefit to switch to unstable (in Gentoo terms) one, unless >>> there is a reason to do otherwise, risking the usage of a less tested >>> (in theory) version. Also note that in case of a security issue, Gentoo >>> would either backport a fix to the older series, or new upstream version >>> (in the same "series" or newer) should be stabilized soon enough. >>> >>> (If there is a version that has a fix on some CVE and is not listed in >>> Gentoo bug tracker, it's a good idea to file a bug there.) >>> >>> >> >>