For stability can we get nvidia-drivers-384.98 back in the repo. I'm seeing
instability (locking and getting kicked out of KDE, games crashing, black
or non-updating screen)

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:19 PM Jerrod Frost <piroisl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Samba bump, if any, could happen after release. No functional changes
> really unless we go 4.7, but even those changes are not something a normal
> user without a domain and controller would run into it seems. 4.7 does try
> to enforce SMB3 usage and discourages SMB1/CIFS for security reasons.
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017, 1:23 PM Joost Ruis <joost.r...@sabayon.org> wrote:
>
>> I recently bumped nvidia-drivers for Entropy against all kernels and
>> wasn't aware that 387.XX is actually a beta version. Just followed what was
>> done on our overlay:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/Sabayon/sabayon-distro/commit/f79f1cf16b1c4d1be390823271710ed73bdae83c
>>
>> @Francesco any thoughts?
>>
>> I must say that I didn't have any problems with them on my gaming laptop.
>> We hopefully have a newer zfs version available in Entropy, one that also
>> supports the 4.14 kernel that is currently in Limbo.
>>
>> @Ettore should have a say about efivar 0.21 -> 31 && efibootmgr 0.12 ->
>> 15. I don't touch them. Same goes for sys-boot/grub.
>>
>> No opinion about Samba here. If we wanna bump this prior to "the release"
>> let me know and I will take care off it.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:06 PM, SÅ‚awomir Nizio <
>> slawomir.ni...@sabayon.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I can comment on this one for sure:
>>>
>>> > Samba (not really sure what to do here. CVE-2017-15275,14746,11103,
>>> list
>>> > goes on an on) we need to be on 4.5.14, but that doesn't cure all the
>>> > CVE on samba's page but switching to 4.7.2 is just switching to a list
>>> > of unknown vulnerabilities. Is it really beneficial to go from 4.5 to
>>> > 4.7? at the very least we should be 4.5.14, but beyond that I'm not
>>> sure
>>> > how we should proceed or the effort it would take to constantly hop as
>>> > samba updates at a pretty fast pace.. Looking for some insight on this
>>> > topic.
>>>
>>> I'm keeping it in the overlay to fix automatic dependency on Ceph. It
>>> was fixed in Gentoo in a new version that is not yet stable.
>>>
>>> I don't see benefit to switch to unstable (in Gentoo terms) one, unless
>>> there is a reason to do otherwise, risking the usage of a less tested
>>> (in theory) version. Also note that in case of a security issue, Gentoo
>>> would either backport a fix to the older series, or new upstream version
>>> (in the same "series" or newer) should be stabilized soon enough.
>>>
>>> (If there is a version that has a fix on some CVE and is not listed in
>>> Gentoo bug tracker, it's a good idea to file a bug there.)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>


Reply via email to