I'd like to keep things as they are really.
I do not see the need for this. It only makes things more complex.
It is good that switching the kernel takes a bit more effort on the
user end, it forces users to read up.
We backward support many kernels and their modules in Entropy, so it
is no probl
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Danilo Pianini
wrote:
> In this review
> (http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2011/10/19/sabayon-7-gnome-3-review/)
> the reviewer suggests to: "For this second stage [kernel update], what
> I would like to see is for the package manager, after the first stage
> has finishe
In this review (http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2011/10/19/sabayon-7-gnome-3-review/)
the reviewer suggests to: "For this second stage [kernel update], what
I would like to see is for the package manager, after the first stage
has finished, to present a list of available kernels, with the
recommended one
