Also if built as an android app it cannot be run on any third-party SFOS ports
(nexus 5 one plus X etc) which do not have the Android app layer.
On Mon Jan 2 05:33:21 2017 GMT-0500, Tone Kastlunger wrote:
> There goes android then. No SFOS. Kinda defyes the point IMO :/.
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017
There goes android then. No SFOS. Kinda defyes the point IMO :/.
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Kaj-Michael Lang wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 09:05 +, Peter Pykäläinen wrote:
> > That is an option yes, but a bit of a cheat :)
>
> Or even more of a filthy and dirty cheat,
Well I do not know if you can call it "cheat" when Jolla itself suggests
for it :P
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Peter Pykäläinen <
peter.pykalai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That is an option yes, but a bit of a cheat :)
>
> Tone Kastlunger kirjoitti maanantai 2. tammikuuta 2017:
> > Bundle it as
We should be allowed to use at least all the same components Jolla itself
is using.
Talk about vibration etc. Those have been in the SFOS from the beginning
and are still not allowed in 3rd party apps.
Kinda lame.
// Peter Pykäläinen
2017-01-02 11:18 GMT+02:00 Kaj-Michael Lang :
On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 09:05 +, Peter Pykäläinen wrote:
> That is an option yes, but a bit of a cheat :)
Or even more of a filthy and dirty cheat, build it instead as a QtQuick
Component 2 Android app and you can use the latest version Qt (My
Android app built on 5.7.0 runs nicely).
But yeah,
That is an option yes, but a bit of a cheat :)
Tone Kastlunger kirjoitti maanantai 2. tammikuuta 2017:
> Bundle it as a private dependency?
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Peter Pykäläinen <
> peter.pykalai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In my opinion we've waited long enough already. Jolla
Bundle it as a private dependency?
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Peter Pykäläinen <
peter.pykalai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In my opinion we've waited long enough already. Jolla should really
> consider to allow more modules if they want better apps.
>
> // Pete
>
> helicalgear . kirjoitti
In my opinion we've waited long enough already. Jolla should really consider to
allow more modules if they want better apps.
// Pete
helicalgear . kirjoitti maanantai 2. tammikuuta 2017:
> Hi,
>
> Qt5.2 itself provided the "QtLocation" as you see.
> But, unfortunately, QtLocation is not