Summary from IRC chat on the topic: David spotted that BuildRequires is not
mentioned in the list of boolean dependencies (thank you!).
So, next question: which condition could I use in %if expansion of SPEC to
distinguish SFOS 3.0.3.x from the earlier versions? Maybe there is some
variable define
Hi,
the problem is while building at OBS:
https://build.merproject.org/package/show/home:rinigus:maps/mapnik
Rinigus
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 4:30 PM David Llewellyn-Jones
wrote:
> On 11/05/2019 16:12, rinigus wrote:
> [snip]
> > BuildRequires: (libicu52-devel or libicu-devel)
> >
> > as in
> >
On 11/05/2019 16:12, rinigus wrote:
[snip]
> BuildRequires: (libicu52-devel or libicu-devel)
>
> as in
> https://github.com/rinigus/pkg-mapnik/blob/da5b6a11667b286c89bbee93eb57e2d4d52d5902/rpm/mapnik.spec#L16
>
[snip]
> Hence the question - how can I add support for 3.0.2.x and 3.0.3.x using
> t
Hi,
with SFOS 3.0.3.x, we have new ICU version which is packaged into libicu
and libicu-devel. As a result, name of the package is different from the
earlier one (had icu52 in the names) and RPM SPEC files need to change the
dependency accordingly. I tried to use `or` in the SPEC without any
succe
