Re: [SailfishDevel] Nemo MW to Mer

2014-04-06 Thread Bernd Wachter
Filip Kłębczyk fklebc...@gmail.com writes: Sorry, but this sounds like, either it will be our (Jolla way) or we are taking toys and are going to different closed sandbox to play. I find it hard to correlate that with lets talk about being more open. Lets not pre-judge. No one is

Re: [SailfishDevel] Nemo MW to Mer

2014-04-06 Thread Filip Kłębczyk
W dniu 06.04.2014 09:57, Bernd Wachter pisze: Filip Kłębczyk fklebc...@gmail.com writes: Sorry, but this sounds like, either it will be our (Jolla way) or we are taking toys and are going to different closed sandbox to play. I find it hard to correlate that with lets talk about being more

[SailfishDevel] Nemo MW to Mer (was: Re: A kickoff meeting [...])

2014-04-05 Thread Thomas Perl
On 05 Apr 2014, at 10:21, Thomas B. Rücker tho...@ruecker.fi wrote: Reading this I can't help but wonder if Jolla now claims ownership of Mer/Nemo then. Even with fancy hat changing. Bringing this discussion up in a strictly Sailfish context implies this. Personally, I see it more like

Re: [SailfishDevel] Nemo MW to Mer

2014-04-05 Thread Filip Kłębczyk
W dniu 05.04.2014 13:37, David Greaves pisze: So yes, Mer is *designed* to support internal builds and vendor-specific modifications. That's great as long as Mer is not one vendor and one company oriented. Sorry, but this sounds like, either it will be our (Jolla way) or we are taking toys