Sanjeev Gupta :
> Can I, please? I am going through the utils directory, and am not sure how
> to rebase if you change upstream.
Go ahead.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lis
Can I, please? I am going through the utils directory, and am not sure how
to rebase if you change upstream.
On 26 Feb 2016 3:27 am, "Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
> Daniel Franke :
> > On 2/25/16, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> > > The script itself seems perl , is the "-w" supposed to be passed to the
> >
Daniel Franke :
> On 2/25/16, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> > The script itself seems perl , is the "-w" supposed to be passed to the
> > perl interpreter? That does not seem to make sense, either.
>
> Yes, I think it is. Look at commit
> 25d702fe88a303929bc940be9294d8a00e1554f5. The first line used to
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Daniel Franke wrote:
>
> Yes, I think it is. Look at commit
> 25d702fe88a303929bc940be9294d8a00e1554f5. The first line used to be
>
> #! @PATH_PERL@ -w
>
> It appears Eric accidentally substituted /usr/bin/env instead of
> /usr/bin/perl during a cleanup of obsolet
On 2/25/16, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> The script itself seems perl , is the "-w" supposed to be passed to the
> perl interpreter? That does not seem to make sense, either.
Yes, I think it is. Look at commit
25d702fe88a303929bc940be9294d8a00e1554f5. The first line used to be
#! @PATH_PERL@ -w
It a
Hi,
The first line of calc_tickadj says:
#!/usr/bin/env -w
I have searched man pages going back to SunOS 4.1, and RedHat 4.2, etc, but
cannot find a reference to what the "-w" option is supposed to do. Most
early env implementations support only the "-i" option.
The script itself seems perl
