Yo Eric!
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 21:56:19 -0400
"Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
> Gary E. Miller :
> > Yo Eric!
> >
> > This needs to be reverted, or fixed. I fixed the main config
> > code to allow minpoll=0, I did NOT change any specific refclock that
> > overrules the basic rules.o
> >
> > refclock_j
e...@thyrsus.com said:
> Well, if we still need ntp_calendar.c I thinmk you probably should not
> delete tests/libntp/calendar.c - thats its unit test, no?
Thanks. (good thing I asked)
tests/libntp/calendar also tested some stuff in libntp/calyearstart.c
I removed that code.
--
These are my
Hal Murray :
>
> e...@thyrsus.com said:
> >> What part of NTP needs calendar code? That seems like the sort of code
> you
> >> would be trying to rip out.
>
> > The implicit premise is that in the real world maximum clock skew of any two
> > live systems is bounded to within a fairly small amou
Gary E. Miller :
> Yo Eric!
>
> This needs to be reverted, or fixed. I fixed the main config
> code to allow minpoll=0, I did NOT change any specific refclock that
> overrules the basic rules.o
>
> refclock_jyy is one such driver:
>
> refclock_jjy.c: if ( peer->minpoll < 8 ) {
> refclock_
g...@rellim.com said:
> Yes. That was me. I was wondering how long until someone noticed.
Please don't push code that is known to be broken. If there is a good
reason, please tell us what/why etc.
The only good reason I can think of would be fixing something else that is
more broken.
--
e...@thyrsus.com said:
>> What part of NTP needs calendar code? That seems like the sort of code
you
>> would be trying to rip out.
> The implicit premise is that in the real world maximum clock skew of any two
> live systems is bounded to within a fairly small amount. So when you
> interpret a
Yo Hal!
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 13:30:29 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> Some of my PPS refclocks are now ramping up the poll interval.
> I think there used to be some code that set maxpoll to minpoll for
> refclocks. Did you break that?
Yes. That was me. I was wondering how long until someone noticed.
Some of my PPS refclocks are now ramping up the poll interval.
*GPS_NMEA(0) .GPS.0 l4 64 3770.000 -61.938 91.790
oPPS(0) .PPS.0 l2 256 3770.0003.679 1.919
*NMEA(0) .GPS.0 l 252 256 3770.0008.697 5.0
Yo Eric!
This needs to be reverted, or fixed. I fixed the main config
code to allow minpoll=0, I did NOT change any specific refclock that
overrules the basic rules.o
refclock_jyy is one such driver:
refclock_jjy.c: if ( peer->minpoll < 8 ) {
refclock_jjy.c: /* minpoll must be greater o
