Hal Murray via devel :
>
> Richard Laager said:
> > While I agree that waf is obscure (and accordingly wish ntpsec used
> > something else), it seems to do the right thing out of the box.
>
> What are the alternatives? Are there any good ones?
I've done a lot of research and experimenting in t
Richard Laager said:
> While I agree that waf is obscure (and accordingly wish ntpsec used
> something else), it seems to do the right thing out of the box.
What are the alternatives? Are there any good ones?
Is there a good URL discussing the issues and tradeoffs?
I'm not familiar with that
On 12/09/2017 03:18 AM, Achim Gratz via devel wrote:
> There are at least three different way of installing _anything_ (let's
> leave the details of Python and the various distro conventions aside for
> the moment):
>
> 1. System-wide, distribution-blessed installation (aka packaging).
> 2. System
On 12/08/2017 11:33 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 22:40:55 -0600
> Richard Laager wrote:
>
>> On 12/08/2017 09:20 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
>>> By Debian rules, ulness you do some sort of over-ride, '.waf
>>> install' should never, ever, install into dist-pack
Richard Laager via devel writes:
> If you're advocating that ntpsec's default should install to a
> non-standard place, such that a user MUST configure a custom PYTHONPATH
> environment variable, I think literally everyone else here disagrees
> with you. We are all trying to figure out how to make
