On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 02:10:25AM -0600, Richard Laager via devel wrote:
> On 02/20/2018 09:19 PM, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote:
> > I'll get on the tracker and swat a bunch of small issues I see.
>
> I'd like to suggest the following:
>
> 1) Move #55 out of 1.0.0 milestone.
> 2) Close the 0.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 06:39:32PM -0500, Matthew Selsky via devel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 01:18:10PM -0800, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> > > Yeah, it pushes the web pages.
> >
> > Should I just ignore it?
> >
> > Or tell somebody? If so, who? What would they do?
> >
> > Any idea why
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 01:18:10PM -0800, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> > Yeah, it pushes the web pages.
>
> Should I just ignore it?
>
> Or tell somebody? If so, who? What would they do?
>
> Any idea why I'm getting pairs of messages?
gitlab infrax flakiness...
This CI job is at
https://gi
> Yeah, it pushes the web pages.
Should I just ignore it?
Or tell somebody? If so, who? What would they do?
Any idea why I'm getting pairs of messages?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists
Yo Jason!
Yeah, it pushes the web pages.
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:57:56 -0500
Jason Azze via devel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Hal Murray via devel
> wrote:
> >
>
> > What does "pages:deploy" do? On the diagram of all the steps, it's
> > the lower of the pair on the right.
> >
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
>
> What does "pages:deploy" do? On the diagram of all the steps, it's the lower
> of the pair on the right.
>
It looks like it is a CI job dedicated to:
python ./waf configure --enable-doc --prefix=/tmp/docbot-local
--htmldir=`pwd`/
Again, it's the second of a pair of messages. The first one said it
succeeded.
Subject: ntpsec | Pipeline #18114131 has failed for master | 8c34d988
...
Pipeline #18114131 ( https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/pipelines/18114131 )
triggered by Hal Murray ( https://gitlab.com/hal.murray )
had 1 f
Apologies.
I checked an hour ago, and the guy who assured me that we were using
'native' SNMP has come back saying he setup the cacti script that talks
over ntpq
I have posted a bounty offer on the cacti forum.
Apologies for raising hopes.
On 27 Feb 2018 7:40 pm, "Jason Azze via devel" wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:18 PM, Richard Laager via devel
wrote:
> On 02/26/2018 06:16 PM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>> Richard, I am using cacti.
>
> That's what I was hoping to hear, since I also run Cacti. Are you
> willing to share your templates?
I'm also a Cacti user, though it has been years si
> Related to point 2; do you have rough numbers of how long / many
instances of this have been running?
A few weeks now on at least one. You may recall I had a bug report about
IPv6 addresses.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 2:08 PM,
10 matches
Mail list logo