Hi Mark,
Darn it all. I didn't mean to reply to your email only. I meant to send this to
the Dev list.
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 10:56 PM, "Mark Atwood, Project Manager"
wrote:
> Thank you Mike! Please submit the PEP8 MR after you've fixed the merge
> conflict. I will review yo
Yo Richard!
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:04:31 -0500
Richard Laager via devel wrote:
> I'm doing some digging, and from what I can see Debian/Ubuntu added
> support for shared linking Go libraries and then removed it a couple
> years later.
> conclusive/authoritative answer.
I looked at my Gentoo G
Yo Richard!
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:04:31 -0500
Richard Laager via devel wrote:
> On 09/18/2018 02:06 PM, Achim Gratz via devel wrote:
> > That will not go down well with system packagers. Building
> > "static" is one of those ideas that apparently can't be weeded
> > out. I expect the distribu
On 09/18/2018 02:06 PM, Achim Gratz via devel wrote:
> That will not go down well with system packagers. Building "static" is
> one of those ideas that apparently can't be weeded out. I expect the
> distributions to change their toolchains in no time to default to shared
> linking (system install
Yo Achim!
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 21:06:48 +0200
Achim Gratz via devel wrote:
> Ian Bruene via devel writes:
> > Go is all static linking.
>
> That will not go down well with system packagers.
Not all of them. Source distros like Gentoo will not care.
> Building "static"
> is one of those idea
Ian Bruene via devel writes:
> Go is all static linking.
That will not go down well with system packagers. Building "static" is
one of those ideas that apparently can't be weeded out. I expect the
distributions to change their toolchains in no time to default to shared
linking (system installed)
