Anybody familiar with the retransmission code?
It seems to hang occasionally. A wild guess, there is some backoff code in
there that increases the retransmission timer. That's good. I'm guessing
that my problem is that the timer gets too big. It's not actually hanging,
just running very v
Thank you Hal!
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:53 PM Hal Murray via devel
wrote:
>
> It's simple, at least conceptually. I'm embarrassed I didn't see it
> (much)
> sooner.
>
> The general idea with the old code is:
>
> From several places deep in ntp_io
> read data into rb
> rb->receiver = xxx
>
Richard Laager via devel :
> On 09/18/2018 05:04 PM, Richard Laager wrote:
> > I'm doing some digging, and from what I can see Debian/Ubuntu added
> > support for shared linking Go libraries and then removed it a couple
> > years later. I'm asking in IRC to try to get a more
> > conclusive/authorit
It's simple, at least conceptually. I'm embarrassed I didn't see it (much)
sooner.
The general idea with the old code is:
>From several places deep in ntp_io
read data into rb
rb->receiver = xxx
add_full_recv_buffer(rb)
then way up in ntpd:
rb = get_full_recv_buffer()
(rb->receiver
Yo Richard!
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:44:03 -0500
Richard Laager via devel wrote:
> On 09/18/2018 05:04 PM, Richard Laager wrote:
> > I'm doing some digging, and from what I can see Debian/Ubuntu added
> > support for shared linking Go libraries and then removed it a couple
> > years later. I'm ask
On 09/18/2018 05:04 PM, Richard Laager wrote:
> I'm doing some digging, and from what I can see Debian/Ubuntu added
> support for shared linking Go libraries and then removed it a couple
> years later. I'm asking in IRC to try to get a more
> conclusive/authoritative answer.
The response on IRC was
Another item for your list.
Cleanup the table indexes in ntp_control
It has things like:
#define CS_USED_RBUF76
{ CS_USED_RBUF, RO, "used_rbuf" }, /* 76 */
That makes it a royal pain to insert or delete a slot.
We should be able to make a macro that does the #
Paul Theodoropoulos via devel :
> Uniformity of presentation seems like a desireable goal - are there any
> objections to following these particular guidelines?
Not fro me. Go to it.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineeri
