Re: [Bug] 1361811cb botches unused macro

2017-02-20 Thread Achim Gratz
Gary E. Miller writes: > Clearly you understand this better than I. Patch please? Out of round tuits. May need to wait until the weekend. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Q+, Q and microQ: http:

Re: [Bug] 1361811cb botches unused macro

2017-02-20 Thread Gary E. Miller
Yo Achim! On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:38:52 +0100 Achim Gratz wrote: > Gary E. Miller writes: > > I am unclear which macro you are referring to? I thought were you > > talking about REFIDLEN, that is used a lot. > > The patch inadvertently removed the continuation line from > LEN_CRYPTO_TO_ZERO,

Re: [Bug] 1361811cb botches unused macro

2017-02-20 Thread Achim Gratz
Gary E. Miller writes: > I am unclear which macro you are referring to? I thought were you talking > about REFIDLEN, that is used a lot. The patch inadvertently removed the continuation line from LEN_CRYPTO_TO_ZERO, which makes the macro define an incomplete expression. I'm not sure how that cou

Re: [Bug] 1361811cb botches unused macro

2017-02-19 Thread Gary E. Miller
Yo Achim! On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 13:50:16 +0100 Achim Gratz wrote: > While hunting for changes that might have affected the DCF driver I've > come across this gem: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > @@ -433,7 +433,13 @@ struct peer { > #define CRYPTO_TO_ZERO(p

[Bug] 1361811cb botches unused macro

2017-02-19 Thread Achim Gratz
While hunting for changes that might have affected the DCF driver I've come across this gem: --8<---cut here---start->8--- @@ -433,7 +433,13 @@ struct peer { #define CRYPTO_TO_ZERO(p) ((char *)&((p)->clear_to_zero)) #define END_CRYPTO_TO_ZERO(p) ((char