Yo Hal!
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 17:24:56 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> g...@rellim.com said:
> > Yes, that is expected. You need to tetll the Skytrazzq to force
> > the top of the second, and save to flash.
>
> What does that mean?
The Skytraq GPS, and some others, have two modes they can report
t
g...@rellim.com said:
> Yes, that is expected. You need to tetll the Skytrazzq to force the top of
> the second, and save to flash.
What does that mean?
bellyac...@gmail.com said:
> Did that which is why I didn't understand the delivery coming at near the
> end of the second. It appears tho
Yo Mike!
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:45:45 -0400
Mike wrote:
> > Which is why I asked what your other chimers say.
> +199.102.46.75 ( .GPS.1 u 61 64 377 39.468 6.354 2.236
> +fairy.mattnordh 192.5.41.40 2 u 37 64 377 60.559 3.875 0.986
> -origin.towfowi. 204.9.54.1
On 06/19/2016 06:14 PM, Gary E. Miller wrote:
Yo Mike!
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 17:46:48 -0400
Mike wrote:
What do your other chimers in 'ntpq -p show'? Youu still have not
confirmmed which PPS edge you are on. The leading or trailing.
I'll likely put an arrow through this module before I'm abl
Yo Mike!
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 17:46:48 -0400
Mike wrote:
> > What do your other chimers in 'ntpq -p show'? Youu still have not
> > confirmmed which PPS edge you are on. The leading or trailing.
> I'll likely put an arrow through this module before I'm able to get a
> scope hooked up too it!
On 06/19/2016 04:23 PM, Gary E. Miller wrote:
Yo Mike!
`
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 15:59:16 -0400
Mike wrote:
On 06/10/2016 03:17 PM, Gary E. Miller wrote:
Yo Eric!
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:49:22 -0400
"Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
That's... very weird. I've never seen it happen.
But it would ex
Yo Mike!
`
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 15:59:16 -0400
Mike wrote:
> On 06/10/2016 03:17 PM, Gary E. Miller wrote:
> > Yo Eric!
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:49:22 -0400
> > "Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
> >
> >> That's... very weird. I've never seen it happen.
> > But it would explain some old compla
On 06/10/2016 03:17 PM, Gary E. Miller wrote:
Yo Eric!
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:49:22 -0400
"Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
That's... very weird. I've never seen it happen.
But it would explain some old complaints.
Now that we know which Skytraq option it is, I recall always selecting
the workaroun
Yo Eric!
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:49:22 -0400
"Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
> That's... very weird. I've never seen it happen.
But it would explain some old complaints.
Now that we know which Skytraq option it is, I recall always selecting
the workaround.
> It sounds as though for some crazy reason
Yo Hal!
On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 20:46:58 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> e...@thyrsus.com said:
> > That's odd. The normal semtence budget including GPGSV should fit
> > inside a second. Are you getting some kind of $PMTK thing that
> > pushes it over?
>
> I'm using gpsmon to watch the output. Ther
Yo Hal!
On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 17:29:19 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> > Can you send me the output of this when it fails:
>
> Not anytime soon. It's working correctly and I can't predict when it
> will fail.
Luckily we have a hard test case to work on.
But, I have found a way to predict some of t
> Can you send me the output of this when it fails:
Not anytime soon. It's working correctly and I can't predict when it will
fail.
g...@rellim.com said:
> Well, then not the case at hand. the current problem is two edges per
> second, 500 milliSec apart.
How would an extra pulse at 500 ms
Yo Hal!
On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 17:04:08 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> > GPS module is a ST22, SkyTraq Venus 6 chipset.
> [ntpq -p shows PPS link off by a second.]
>
> It's a gpsd bug/quirk. I've seen the same thing on a PC with a Venus
> chip connected via USB.
>
> I mentioned it a month or two ag
13 matches
Mail list logo
