Re: [ntp:hackers] u-blox LKM Timemark driver

2018-08-21 Thread Achim Gratz via devel
MLewis via devel writes: > I once saw numbers and a timing diagram on the time range that the M8T > takes to capture its timemark (haven't found them again). My guess is that you've been looking at something other than an M8T. > I'm speculating that the lag to timemark could be variable, and that

Re: [ntp:hackers] u-blox LKM Timemark driver

2018-08-20 Thread MLewis via devel
Achim On 20/08/2018 4:04 PM, Achim Gratz via devel wrote: MLewis via devel writes: Agreed. Except possible benefit with alignment, as described above. You don't need any alignment either way (for NTP that is), just reasonably equal-spaced pulses to correlate system w/ GPS time. It's not even