Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0

2020-06-17 Thread Hal Murray via devel
k...@roeckx.be said: > Note that we're still waiting for a reply from you about your test code. I > would like to see if it's possible to improve the speed in 3.0.0, or at least > understand where the slowdown comes from. Sorry. Richard Levitte's message said "I would very much like to see

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0

2020-06-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx via devel
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:54:57PM -0700, Hal Murray via devel wrote: > > They are up to alpha3. I've been trying it. > > I added a tweak to wscript to support this, and some notes in HOWTO-OpenSSL > That recipe also works for getting 1.1.1 on old systems so they can use NTS. > > - >

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0

2020-06-16 Thread Fred Wright via devel
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, Mike Simpson via devel wrote: There is libressl from the OpenBSD team https://www.libressl.org/ It was forked from openssl in 2014 The last time I tried it, libaes_siv wouldn't build with LibreSSL, so that would need to be fixed. Unless LibreSSL provides an adequate

Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0

2020-06-16 Thread Mike Simpson via devel
Hi Hal, There is libressl from the OpenBSD team https://www.libressl.org/ It was forked from openssl in 2014 Mike > On 16 Jun 2020, at 07:55, Hal Murray via devel wrote: > >  > They are up to alpha3. I've been trying it. > > I added a tweak to wscript to support this, and some notes in

OpenSSL 3.0.0

2020-06-16 Thread Hal Murray via devel
They are up to alpha3. I've been trying it. I added a tweak to wscript to support this, and some notes in HOWTO-OpenSSL That recipe also works for getting 1.1.1 on old systems so they can use NTS. - There are several big changes in 3.0.0 The CMAC_* API that we have been using is