devel@ntpsec.org said:
> Indeed. Right now, if anything in attic fails to build, then the entire
> build is broken, even though nothing in attic is to be installed. IMO, any
> item which is neither installed by 'install', nor needed to build an item
> installed by 'install', shouldn't be incl
On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
matthew.sel...@twosigma.com said:
Are we worried about the speed of the build, lack of build support on
particular platforms, or something else?
I'm not particularly concerned about the speed of a build. As far as I know,
nobody has complain
matthew.sel...@twosigma.com said:
> Are we worried about the speed of the build, lack of build support on
> particular platforms, or something else?
I'm not particularly concerned about the speed of a build. As far as I know,
nobody has complained about build times or suggested not building a
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:16:26PM -0800, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
>
> I have a simple patch that will turn off building things in attic/
>
> Should we make off be the default and change that to --enable-attic?
Hi Hal,
Are we worried about the speed of the build, lack of build support on
pa
On Feb 15, 2022 1:16 PM, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
I have a simple patch that will turn off building things in attic/
Should we make off be the default and change that to --enable-attic?Probably, tomorrow never comes. How's it going with dropping Python 2.6, oh we aren't.
I have a simple patch that will turn off building things in attic/
Should we make off be the default and change that to --enable-attic?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
https://lists.ntpsec.org/mailm
