gt; relying on response *after* delivery to notify the host of resource issues,
> and getting much worse in multi-initiator FCP environments (consider - do the
> initiators know to back off/slow down at all ? what about io storms, etc)
>
> -- james s
>
>
> Ronnie Koch wrote:
&g
Erez,
When I teach I use unsolicited data as an example of the differences
between iSCSI and FC and why you need a Gateway between the 2 kinds of
SAN but now that I think about it - I have never checked the SCSI-FCP
standard to verify this :)
Regards
Ronnie
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 09:11 +0300,
ess"
FWIW
Regards
Ronnie
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 10:58 -0700, Joe Eykholt wrote:
> Ronnie Koch wrote:
> > Joe,
> >
> > Sad (bad ?) news. I am "currently" not of much use in coding (last
> > serious relevant coding in assembler with BSC and H/SDLC) but if the
Robert,
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 10:31 -0700, Robert Love wrote:
> Each kernel module (libfc.ko, libfcoe.ko and fcoe.ko) has a debug
> logging module parameter. So, for fcoe.ko you can write to the
> /sys/module/fcoe/parameters/debug_logging file to change the debug
> logging level. The files repr
Thanks, something to play with tomorrow
Ronnie
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 10:31 -0700, Robert Love wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 17:00 +0200, Ronnie Koch wrote:
> > Seems I am not the only one. This looks somewhat similar.
> >
> > http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread
Joe,
Sad (bad ?) news. I am "currently" not of much use in coding (last
serious relevant coding in assembler with BSC and H/SDLC) but if there
is anything I can do to help . (while the economy is slow).
Regards
Ronnie
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 10:00 -0700, Joe Eykholt wrote:
>
Seems I am not the only one. This looks somewhat similar.
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=112100
Ronnie
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 14:01 +0200, Ronnie Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At last I have a somewhat working P-t-P testing environment. I got the
> OpenSolaris FCoE
nows")
Regards
Ronnie
-
--------
Ronnie Koch | Snailmail: POBox 60124
Bsc Eng (Elec)(Pret) MSAIEE |Pierre van Ryneveld 0045
Tel: +27-(0)83-2270548|South Africa
Email:
Hi,
Now that I can build it I get a segmentation fault with fcconf. Found a
post from Jan 2008 saying "Fixed build by removing no longer in use
sa_state.o and sa_timer.o from OOK Makefile." but it seems kernel
related.
Right now I am concerned that I am flogging a dead horse. Does this
thing stil
ot;"
$(PROGRAM): $(OBJECTS) $(LIBRARIES)
$(ECHO) ' LINK' $@; \
- $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ \
+ $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -shared -o $@ \
$(OBJECTS) $(LIBRARIES) $(SYSTEM_LIBRARIES)
endif
Regards
Ronne
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at
Currently stuck on loader/linker error with "FC0E target user" and any
help, pointers will be appreciated.
System is Ubuntu 8.04 with back-level 2.6.23.17 kernel. (I can also get
to the same point with a 2.6.30.4 kernel on Ubuntu 9.04)
make[5]: Entering directory
`/usr/src/open-fcoe-target-user/
:32 +0200, Ronnie Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am following the "Detailed Setup document" as recommended. I have
> built a 2.6.23 kernel starting with a Ubuntu 8.04 base and it seems OK.
> I have also built scst, openfctgt and libHBAAPI.
>
> Step 4 Build fcconf is giv
Hi,
I am following the "Detailed Setup document" as recommended. I have
built a 2.6.23 kernel starting with a Ubuntu 8.04 base and it seems OK.
I have also built scst, openfctgt and libHBAAPI.
Step 4 Build fcconf is giving me grief.
1. On Ubuntu `uname -i` returns "unknown" but `uname -m` seems
ould get
arround all except the fsg->page = sg->page; one. Don't know what to do
with fsg->page.
Till tomorrow
Ronnie
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 17:42 +0200, Ronnie Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying get an FCOE target going for testing.
>
> I have rebuilt a Ubunt
Hi,
I am trying get an FCOE target going for testing.
I have rebuilt a Ubuntu 2.6.30 i386 kernel to get FCOE initiator and it
seems OK but open-fcoe-target does not compile. Google did not help and
I am actually more than slightly out of my depth.
Any pointers. nudges etc would be appreciated.
15 matches
Mail list logo
