On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 10:01 -0700, Joe Eykholt wrote:
> Chris Leech wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:11:38AM -0700, Alex Lyakas wrote:
> >> Hi Joe,
> >> Thank you for taking time to answer.
> >> I have taken the latest snapshot of fcoe-next tree, and have studied the
> >> new code.
> >> I woul
We could have an array of exchanges instead of the array of pointers,
but that locks up more memory if we overestimate the XID range.
>> - just a note that fc_lport.disc_work and fc_exch_mgr.ex_list are not
>> used
Alex, why don't you submit patches to delete the unused fields?
>&
ust a note that fc_lport.disc_work and fc_exch_mgr.ex_list are not
> used
>
> Thank you,
> Alex.
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Eykholt [mailto:jeykh...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 8:31 PM
> To: Alex Lyakas
> Cc: devel@open-fcoe.org
&
oe Eykholt [mailto:jeykh...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 8:31 PM
To: Alex Lyakas
Cc: devel@open-fcoe.org
Subject: Re: [Open-FCoE] Questions about libfc code
Alex Lyakas wrote:
> Dear open-fcoe developers,
>
> I am new to open-fcoe, and for now I am mostly concentrating on
&
Alex Lyakas wrote:
> Dear open-fcoe developers,
>
> I am new to open-fcoe, and for now I am mostly concentrating on learning
> the libfc code. I was encouraged to ask questions about the code on this
> list. Would appreciate your time to look at my questions:
>
> - fc_disc_new_target() and fc_d
Dear open-fcoe developers,
I am new to open-fcoe, and for now I am mostly concentrating on learning
the libfc code. I was encouraged to ask questions about the code on this
list. Would appreciate your time to look at my questions:
- fc_disc_new_target() and fc_disc_del_target(): it looks like t
