I pulled the latest developer snapshot and did some tests with drop()
and exit() in branch_route
Everything went as expected!
Thank you
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi Tavis,
>
> please see my latest email about how to get fresh code of devel version.
>
> regards,
> bogdan
>
> Tavis P wrote:
>
Patches item #1470001, was opened at 2006-04-13 11:30
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by torturedsoul
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743022&aid=1470001&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the c
On Friday 21 April 2006 13:22, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi Juha,
>
> thanks for the hint - I will take a look on it and we might set up a
> anonymous SVN on a non-sf machine (as I understood, the sync works from
> cvs to svn only)
You can try to use tailor. It is able to synchronize between ev
User: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2006/04/21 04:54:07 PDT
OpenSER CVS - Commit Details
Modified files:
modules/dialog dlg_cb.h dlg_handlers.c
Commit Log:
- more dialog callbacks added: DLGCB_EARLY and DLGCB_RESPONSE_FWDED
Patch provided by Ron Winacott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revis
Bugs item #1474155, was opened at 2006-04-21 13:38
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1474155&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Hi Elias,
indeed the build_dlg_ack() was specially designed to build acks for 2xx
replies and not for negative replies - and there are different building
algorithms
please post this bug on the tracker and I will take care of it.
thanks and regards,
bogdan
Elias Baixas wrote:
Hi all,
I
Hi Juha,
thanks for the hint - I will take a look on it and we might set up a
anonymous SVN on a non-sf machine (as I understood, the sync works from
cvs to svn only)
regards,
bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
> in the mean while we investigate the possibility of set
Hi, I want use 2 ser, a.com and b.com
When an user from a.com wants to call to an user from b.com, the messages are
sent directly to b.com, and a.com doesn't realise about that.
what can I do to make all messages coming from an user from a.com go ever
through a.com?
regards
Javier Ramirez
_
