SourceForge.net writes:
> #0 fm_free (qm=0x283c9000, p=0x65726f63) at
> mem/f_malloc.c:334
> #1 0x283970b2 in empty_hash_table
> (hash_table=0x28550890) at hash.c:288
> #2 0x28397210 in free_hash_table (table=0x28550890) at
> hash.c:95
> #3 0x2839bc21 in clean_trusted () at trusted.c:19
Bugs item #1477666, was opened at 2006-04-27 14:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lowgitek
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1477666&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #1477666, was opened at 2006-04-27 14:39
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by lowgitek
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1477666&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comme
Bugs item #1477666, was opened at 2006-04-27 14:39
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by lowgitek
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1477666&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comme
Bugs item #1477666, was opened at 2006-04-27 14:39
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1477666&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Nevermind this. I noticed after replying that you have already closed the
tracker entry.
On Thursday 27 April 2006 12:44, Dan Pascu wrote:
>
> Ok, so I take it that the patch you posted to the tracker is no longer
> needed and can be discarded?
>
> > Andy
--
Dan
__
On Thursday 27 April 2006 11:53, Andreas Granig wrote:
> Dan Pascu wrote:
> > I didn't say it should work in your scenarios as it is. It's possible
> > that it doesn't work in that scenario (considering that the sign-in
> > is a bit strict to avoid caller/called confusion and also to avoid a
> > 3r
Patches item #1477030, was opened at 2006-04-26 17:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by agranig
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743022&aid=1477030&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the commen
Dan Pascu wrote:
I didn't say it should work in your scenarios as it is. It's possible that
it doesn't work in that scenario (considering that the sign-in is a bit
strict to avoid caller/called confusion and also to avoid a 3rd party
trying to divert the media stream to himself)
Yes, I know,
Hi,
I suddenly started to get the following in my logs:
Apr 27 10:18:29 proxy-01 /usr/sbin/openser[19868]: 195.18.134.147:5060
<= 195.18.134.150:36620 Replication (nat)
()
Apr 27 10:18:29 proxy-01 /usr/sbin/openser[19868]: ERROR:parse_headers:
memory allocation error
Apr 27 10:18:29 proxy-01 /usr/
Hi,
just a question.
Does anyone else think that having avariable as input to from_gw could
be interesting? (from_gw(avp))
In my scenario I have the PSTN access going though the load balancing
layer, and I have to use the lcr on the LB layer to tell the Routing
layer that the request is from a gw
11 matches
Mail list logo
