[OpenSER-Devel] RE: [OpenSER-Users] MI_XMLPRC supports new versions of libxmlrpc-c3

2007-10-05 Thread Edson
Well, I can say that it compiles smoothly on OpenSUSE 10.2 with xmlrpc-c-1.06.18. Thanks for the patch, Dragos. Edson >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Norman Brandinger >Sent: sexta-feira, 5 de outubro de 2007 11:43 >To

RE: [OpenSER-Devel] SF.net SVN: openser: [2870] trunk/modules/mi_xmlrpc

2007-10-05 Thread Edson
Thanks for the upgraded support, know I have no problems to compile it in OpenSUSE 10.2 with xmlrpc-c-1.06.18. Edson >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei Iancu >Sent: sexta-feira, 5 de outubro de 2007 11:2

RE: [OpenSER-Devel] mi_xmlrpc for non Debian

2007-10-03 Thread Edson
yss code that you can't use xmlrpc_server_abyss_set_handlers(), you probably want to anyway. */ It seems to me that some upgrade have to be done, since the module is based on the 0.9.10 version and the actual stable version is 1.06.18 and unstable goes by 1.12.00. Edson >-Original Message- >From: [

RE: [OpenSER-Devel] Carrierroute Compile Requirement

2007-09-17 Thread Edson
Yeap... I see that... THANKS Edson >-Original Message- >From: Henning Westerholt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: segunda-feira, 17 de setembro de 2007 09:46 >To: devel@openser.org >Cc: Edson; 'Norman Brandinger' >Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Devel] Carrierroute Comp

RE: [OpenSER-Devel] Carrierroute Compile Requirement

2007-09-17 Thread Edson
rry for that. Is the INSTALL file on the root directory. But You are right, on the 'carrierroute' module README the information is present. Edson >-Original Message- >From: Norman Brandinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: sábado, 15 de setembro de 2007 12:13 >To:

[OpenSER-Devel] Carrierroute Compile Requirement

2007-09-15 Thread Edson
l" packages. Could someone update this requirements? Thanks Edson ___ Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

RE: [OpenSER-Devel] Building openser against new xmlrpc-c

2007-09-11 Thread Edson
Humm... I see... Any way, thanks for the point/reason... Edson >-Original Message- >From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: terça-feira, 11 de setembro de 2007 14:31 >To: Edson >Cc: 'Barry deFreese'; devel@openser.org >Subject: RE: [OpenSER-Dev

RE: [OpenSER-Devel] Building openser against new xmlrpc-c

2007-09-11 Thread Edson
dent on an old version of the libxmlrpc-c3-dev package (0.9.10-4). But that's what I understand from the above e-mail. Maybe it had been upgraded, but since I have this same problem... Edson >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf

RE: [OpenSER-Devel] openserctl ping

2007-08-24 Thread Edson
echo -ne "$CMD" > /tmp/cmd hexdump -c /tmp/cmd echo -e "\n---\n" CTLCMD="echo -en" RET="$($CTLCMD $CMD)" echo $RET And run it: teste edson I got this output: 000 t _ u a c _ d l g

RE: [OpenSER-Devel] openserctl ping

2007-08-24 Thread Edson
x27;\"Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\"$'\r\n'" And not: CMD="t_uac_dlg OPTIONS \"$1\" \".\" \".\" \"From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"$'\r\n'"To: <$1>"$'\r\n'"Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [OpenSER-Devel] openserctl ping

2007-08-24 Thread Edson
Sorry, Juha... my fault... :( Please try: RET="$($CTLCMD "$CMD" | head -1)" Edson >-Original Message- >From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: sexta-feira, 24 de agosto de 2007 15:36 >To: Edson >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; devel@opens

RE: [OpenSER-Devel] openserctl ping

2007-08-24 Thread Edson
I think that this can help You: RET="$($CTLCMD $CMD | head -1)" Edson >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Juha Heinanen >Sent: sexta-feira, 24 de agosto de 2007 12:36 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: de

RE: [OpenSER-Devel] Request for comments: sdpparser: module orintegrated into the core

2007-08-10 Thread Edson
p:off - - - - --uniqueBoundary Content-Type: application/gtd Content-Disposition: signal;handling=optional CPG, PRN,isdn*,,QSIG*, --uniqueBoundary-- *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* END of SDP I only changed the IP, all rest is SDP body. Sorry for the inconvinience... :( Edson >-Original Message---

RE: [OpenSER-Devel] Request for comments: sdpparser: module orintegrated into the core

2007-08-10 Thread Edson
Hi, Ovidus... Just to let You know that multipart SDP are generated by Cisco GWs (at least 3810 and 5300 models). I don't know there types, I'm not good in SDP, but seems to be one for codecs and other for facilities. If You whana a hand, maybe I can help You in this tests

[OpenSER-Devel] RE: [OpenSER-Users] MediaProxy 2.0 roadmap

2007-07-23 Thread Edson
How about some time-out funtionality? So that out-time calls could be disconnected, or forwarded (to a URA, p.ex.) after a predefined time or after receiving a Radius PoD packet?? All to accommodate better Pre-Pay systems. Edson >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [

[Devel] Extra Radius Atributes

2007-06-05 Thread Edson
passed to Radius. Where are the packets mounted? And how to make the server understand it? Is this an "automagic" behavior? And is there a way to translate this AVP to an internal Radius variable? If this is not the correct place to ask all of this questions, please forgive me, but I have