[Devel] Re: [NETLINK] Don't attach callback to a going-away netlink socket

2007-04-28 Thread David Miller
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:13:51 +1000 > [NETLINK]: Kill CB only when socket is unused > > Since we can still receive packets until all references to the > socket are gone, we don't need to kill the CB until that happens. > This also aligns ourselves with the r

[Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/9] Containers (V9): Basic container framework

2007-04-28 Thread Paul Jackson
+static ssize_t container_read_uint(struct container *cont, struct cftype *cft, + struct file *file, + char __user *buf, size_t nbytes, + loff_t *ppos) +{ + char tmp[64]; + u64 val = cft->

[Devel] Re: [PATCH 0/9] Containers (V9): Generic Process Containers

2007-04-28 Thread Paul Jackson
> - decide whether "Containers" is an acceptable name for the system > given its usage by some other development groups, or whether something > else (ProcessSets? ResourceGroups? TaskGroups?) would be better I place in nomination: tasksets However this would conflict with the taskset uti