Paul Jackson wrote:
> Balbir wrote:
>> Thanks for the script. Would you like to contribute this script to
>> LTP for wider availability and testing?
>
> Sounds good - though I'm a tad lazy, and don't know how to contribute
> this to the LTP.
>
> You're welcome to contribute it yourself, if that's
Balbir wrote:
> Thanks for the script. Would you like to contribute this script to
> LTP for wider availability and testing?
Sounds good - though I'm a tad lazy, and don't know how to contribute
this to the LTP.
You're welcome to contribute it yourself, if that's easier for you,
or to point me in
Paul Jackson wrote:
> Balbir wrote:
>
> 1) Testing batch schedulers against cpusets:
>
> I doubt that the batch scheduler developers would be able to
> extract a cpuset test from their tests, or be able to share it if
> they did. Their tests tend to be large tests of batch scheduler
On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:18:29 -0400 (EDT)
Scott Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:07:49PM -0400, Scott Murray wrote:
> > > Sorry, it took me a few days to get to testing this out. It looks good,
> > >
> > > but I
The patch titled
Merge sys_clone()/sys_unshare() nsproxy and namespace handling
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
merge-sys_clone-sys_unshare-nsproxy-and-namespace.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
-
