Subrata Modak wrote:
Nadia Derbey wrote:
Matt Helsley wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 18:16 +0100, Nadia Derbey wrote:
+#define MAX_MSGQUEUES 16 /* MSGMNI as defined in linux/msg.h */
+
It's not quite the maximum anymore, is it? More like the minumum
maximum ;). A better name migh
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Li Zefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Menage wrote:
> > I think that docbook-style function comments need /** at the start of
> > the comment block.
> >
>
> Yes, I didn't notice it. I revised the patch to fix it.
>
>
> ---
>
>
> fix:
> - comments about n
On Thu, Feb 7, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +
> +[cb] :(|*) [r-][w-]
> + ^ ^ ^
> + | | |
> + | | +--- access rights (1)
> + | |
> + | +-- device major and minor numbers (2)
At SSTIC (french security conference), Jonathan ROUZAUD-CORNABAS will
present another approach of LBVM proposal that support fully automatic
live migration on a grid of computer. The virtualization is based on
OpenVZ and apply for Secured Remote Desktop.
More info: http://www.sstic.org/
Jonath
> Nadia Derbey wrote:
> > Matt Helsley wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 18:16 +0100, Nadia Derbey wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> +#define MAX_MSGQUEUES 16 /* MSGMNI as defined in linux/msg.h */
> >>> +
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> It's not quite the maximum anymore, is it? More like the minumum
>
Nadia Derbey wrote:
Matt Helsley wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 18:16 +0100, Nadia Derbey wrote:
+#define MAX_MSGQUEUES 16 /* MSGMNI as defined in linux/msg.h */
+
It's not quite the maximum anymore, is it? More like the minumum
maximum ;). A better name might better document what t
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:
It would be nicer to replace the entire hand-made name
allocation to remove the 100 device limit.
Actually, I thought the same, but fixing % in names looks like a
BUG-fix for 2.6.25, while removing t
Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 18:16 +0100, Nadia Derbey wrote:
>
>
>
>>+#define MAX_MSGQUEUES 16 /* MSGMNI as defined in linux/msg.h */
>>+
>
>
> It's not quite the maximum anymore, is it? More like the minumum
> maximum ;). A better name might better document what the test
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>
>>> It would be nicer to replace the entire hand-made name
>>> allocation to remove the 100 device limit.
>>>
>> Actually, I thought the same, but fixing % in names looks like a
>> BUG-fix for 2.6.25, while removing the h
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:
It would be nicer to replace the entire hand-made name
allocation to remove the 100 device limit.
Actually, I thought the same, but fixing % in names looks like a
BUG-fix for 2.6.25, while removing the hand-made name allocation
looks like an en
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Four tunnel drivers (ip_gre, ipip, ip6_tunnel and sit) can
>> receive a pre-defined name for a device from the userspace.
>> Since these drivers call the register_netdevice() after this
>> (rtnl_lock is held), the device's name may contain a '%'
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Four tunnel drivers (ip_gre, ipip, ip6_tunnel and sit) can
receive a pre-defined name for a device from the userspace.
Since these drivers call the register_netdevice() after this
(rtnl_lock is held), the device's name may contain a '%'
character.
Not sure how bad is th
Four tunnel drivers (ip_gre, ipip, ip6_tunnel and sit) can
receive a pre-defined name for a device from the userspace.
Since these drivers call the register_netdevice() after this
(rtnl_lock is held), the device's name may contain a '%'
character.
Not sure how bad is this to have a device with a
Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 18:16 +0100, Nadia Derbey wrote:
>
>
>
>>+#define MAX_MSGQUEUES 16 /* MSGMNI as defined in linux/msg.h */
>>+
>
>
> It's not quite the maximum anymore, is it? More like the minumum
> maximum ;). A better name might better document what the test
14 matches
Mail list logo
